Inauguration Ukraine's parliament had (on 16 February) fixed 25 February 2010 for the inauguration of Yanukovych as president.
Ukrainian president Viktor Yushchenko signed a decree endorsing a plan of events related to Yanukovych's inauguration on 20 February 2010. Yushchenko also congratulated and wished Yanukovych "to defend Ukrainian interests and democratic traditions" at the presidential post.
Patriarch Kirill of
Moscow and All Rus at Yanukovych's invitation conducted a public prayer service at
Kyiv Pechersk Lavra before Yanukovych's presidential inauguration. Kirill also attended the inauguration along with
High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton,
United States National Security Advisor James Jones and
speaker of the Russian parliament Boris Gryzlov. Yanukovych's immediate predecessor, Yushchenko, did not attend the ceremony, nor did the Prime Minister,
Yulia Tymoshenko, and her party,
Bloc Yulia Tymoshenko.
First steps as president , 5 March 2010 On 3 March 2010, Yanukovych suspended his membership in the Party of Regions as he was barred by the
Constitution from heading a political party while president, and handed over leadership in the party and its parliamentary faction to
Mykola Azarov. The predominant expectation of political experts following Yanukovych's election as president was that he would likely pursue a Kuchma-style "
multi-vector" policy internationally, and that his presidential authority would be weakened as a result of the
constitutional amendments made in 2004. However, those forecasts were made invalid by the swift concentration of power by the president and his Party of Regions, which some analysts interpreted as a parliamentary
coup d'etat and made comparisons to the historical
Nazi policies of
Gleichschaltung.
Establishment of the Azarov government The Party of Regions and its satellites - the
Communist Party of Ukraine and the
Lytvyn Bloc - did not have a parliamentary majority in order to create a new government. The Ukrainian Constitution stipulated that a government should be created by a
coalition of parliamentary fractions, not by individual members of parliament. Those amendments had been introduced in 2004 in order to limit
political corruption. As a result, the only legal way for the Party of Regions to create a government was to establish a coalition either with the
Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc or with Yushchenko's "
Our Ukraine", or to announce early parliamentary elections. However, Yanukovych and his supporters opted for a different way of forming a parliamentary majority: at the initiative of the Party of Regions, the parliament amended the law by allowing separate members of parliament to be accepted into the coalition on an individual basis, even if they belonged to opposition. As a result, the new "Stability and Reforms" coalition was formed by the fraction of the Party of Regions, Lytvyn Bloc and the Communists, as well as 12 members of parliament from the fractions of Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc and "Our Ukraine", including notable figures such as
Ivan Plyushch,
Oleksandr Omelchenko,
Ihor Rybakov and
Ihor Palytsia. The latter became known under the derogatory term
tushky (, literally - "
carcasses"). The way in which the new coalition was formed was deemed by observers to be illegal and anti-constitutional. Despite controversy, Ukrainian lawmakers formed the new coalition on 11 March 2010 which included
Lytvyn Bloc,
Communist Party of Ukraine and Party of Regions that led to the Azarov Government. 235 deputies from the 450-member parliament signed the coalition agreement. The decision was approved by the
Constitutional Court of Ukraine and accepted by Western governments and the Ukrainian opposition, with the previous prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko agreeing to step down. According to
Roman Zabzaliuk, a former member of parliament from Yulia Tymoshenko's Bloc, who later switched sides and entered the governing coalition, each individual parliamentarian joining the pro-Yanukovych faction in Verkhovna Rada was promised a one-time payment of $450,000 plus an additional monthly allowance of $20,000 in cash for "proper voting".
Concentration of power demonstration in Kyiv, June 2010
Subordination of government branches Within a few months, Yanukovych and his team had effectively subordinated all branches of Ukrainian government and marginalized the opposition. The new political regime was seen by some as a continuation of Leonid Kuchma's "blackmail state". Judiciary was de-facto subject to the authorities, with
Prosecutor-General Viktor Pshonka himself openly claiming to be a member of the "president's team". This allowed authorities to selectively apply law to the political opposition. According to the newspaper
Ukraina Moloda, half a year after Yanukovych's election Ukraine was closer to becoming a
police state than it had ever been since independence. The reform of administration launched during the first year of Yanukovych's presidency resulted in the reshuffling of a number of government agencies, but was also seen as a way to further concentrate power in the president's hands.
Constitutional amendments On 25 June 2010, Yanukovych criticised 2004 amendments in the
Ukrainian Constitution which weakened presidential powers such as control over naming government ministers, passing those functions to parliament. In autumn of 2010 the Constitutional Court of Ukraine cancelled the 2004 amendments to the Ukrainian Constitution. This step was claimed to remove the last legal obstacle on the way to the complete concentration of power in President Yanukovych's hands. Nevertheless, during the 2011
World Economic Forum, Yanukovych called Ukraine "one of the leaders on democratic development in Eastern Europe". In May 2012, Yanukovych set up the
Constitutional Assembly of Ukraine, a special auxiliary agency under the President for drawing up bills of amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine; the president then can table them in parliament.
Local elections The
local election, which took place on 31 October, was preceded by the introduction of changes in electoral law and replacement of local governors, electoral commission officials and national media managers with pro-government appointees. During the electoral campaign for the 2010 local elections, the police encroached on the people's constitutional right for peaceful protest, the first such instance since the Orange Revolution. Independent journalists, scholars, activists and opposition figures were also harassed by state authorities, with a number of them being imprisoned or blackmailed into dropping their candidaces. In some cases, bogus political parties were created and registered under the same name as oppositional forces. As a result, Yulia Tymoshenko's "
Batkivshchyna", the main rival of the incumbent authorities, was effectively denied participation in several crucial regions during the local election. This led to the rise of the
far-right Svoboda party, whose popularity was mostly concentrated in
Western Ukraine and produced less challenges to the Party of Regions on a national level. According to independent observers, the election didn't meet standards for openness and fairness. As a result of the vote, the Party of Regions received a plurality of 36%, but got a chance to create a majority in many regions by co-opting
independents and entering coalitions with other parties.
State of the rule of law , accusing the president of ties to
organized crime, 2011 Yanukovych had been elected on promises of returning stability, but the state of Ukraine under his rule was described as a "well-ordered lawlessness" modelled on the "manageable democracy" of neighbouring Russia. Under Yanukovych's rule, chief organs responsible for security, most notably the
Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), were headed by
oligarch appointees. Among controversial decisions which were deemed to have negative consequences to the rule of law in Ukraine was the release of
FSB agent Vladimir Noskov, who had attempted to kidnap a Ukrainian security officer. The number of injuries and suspicious deaths reported as "suicides" significantly rose in Ukrainian prisons in the months after Yanukovych's installment.
Persecution of opposition In December 2010 several opposition members of parliament were severely beaten by a group of Party of Regions members in the Verkhovna Rada building. Soon after the event one of the party's leaders
Mykhailo Chechetov denied the fact of the assault and claimed that the opposition MPs "broke their own heads against the wall" and were now trying to accuse their opponents. In early November 2011, Yanukovych claimed that "arms are being bought in the country and armed attacks on government agencies are being prepared." One frequently cited example of Yanukovych's attempts to centralize power is
the 2011 sentencing of Yulia Tymoshenko, which was condemned by Western governments as potentially being politically motivated. Other
high-profile political opponents under criminal investigation include Kuchma,
Bohdan Danylyshyn,
Ihor Didenko,
Anatoliy Makarenko, and
Valeriy Ivaschenko. According to Yanukovych (on 4 February 2011), "[M]any lies [have been] told and attempts made to misinform the international community and ordinary people in Ukraine about the true state of affairs in the country." He also stated, "[A] crushing blow delivered under [my] rule to corruption and bureaucracy has been met with resistance". He stated in February 2012 that the trial of Tymoshenko and other former officials "didn't meet European standards and principles".
Press censorship ''' Ukraine moved from "noticeable problems" 89th place in 2009, to "difficult situation" 126th place in 2013 As president, Yanukovych stated in early February 2010 that he would support the
freedom of speech of journalists and protect their interests. During spring 2010 Ukrainian journalists and
Reporters Without Borders complained of censorship by Yanukovych's
Presidential Administration; despite statements by Yanukovych how deeply he valued press freedom and that 'free, independent media that must ensure society's unimpeded access to information.' Anonymous journalists stated early May 2010 that they were voluntarily tailoring their coverage so as not to offend the Yanukovych administration and the Azarov Government. The Azarov Government, the
Presidential Administration and Yanukovych himself denied being involved with censorship. In a press conference 12 May 2010 President Yanukovych's representative in the Parliament Yury Miroshnychenko stated that Yanukovych was against political repression for criticism of the regime. The first Year of Yanukovych's presidency saw a significant increase in the number of crimes against journalists, as reported by the
Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group. Many reporters would be illegally searched, detained and interrogated by authorities.
Vote rigging allegations The
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe confirmed witness accounts of voters being blocked from access to polls and being attacked along with local election officials who tried to frustrate the
Berkut's practice of falsifying voters' ballots in favor of Yanukovych's Party of Regions candidates. Individual cases have been reported of citizens grouping together and fighting back against the Berkut in order to preserve election integrity and results. Upon coming to power Yanukovych had reversed oversight measures established during the Yushchenko administration to restrain the Berkut's abuse of citizens whereupon the special force "upped its brutality."
Reports of corruption and cronyism Yanukovych has been criticized for "massive" corruption and cronyism. Ukraine under his rule was described as a "systemically corrupt" country. According to a 2010 report by
Transparency International, 34% of respondents in Ukraine acknowledged paying a
bribe at least once during the past year. At the same time, main institutions charged with eliminating corruption - the judiciary and the police - were perceived by the population as the most corrupt. In February 2012 Yanukovych appointed
Ihor Kalinin and
Dmytro Salamatin as head of SBU and
minister of defence respectively, despite both being known to have been Russian citizens in the past. Soon thereafter mass protests took place in relation to the
murder of Oksana Makar in the southern city of
Mykolaiv, after reports emerged that the murderers had been released due to their alleged ties to the government. This happened in the aftermath of a number of cases, where children and other relatives of important officials from Yanukovych's entourage would be given milder sentences after committing crimes. By January 2013, more than half of the ministers appointed by Yanukovych were either born in the
Donbas region or made some crucial part of their careers there, and Yanukovych has been accused of "regional cronyism" for his staffing of police, judiciary, and tax services "all over Ukraine" with "Donbas people". Over 46% of the budget subventions for social and economic development was allotted to the Donbas region's Donetsk Oblast and
Luhansk Oblast administrations – ₴0.62 billion ($76.2 million) versus ₴0.71 billion ($87.5 million) for the rest of the country. Yanukovych's political clan has been often described by Ukrainian publicists as a "
Donetsk mafia".
Anders Åslund, a Swedish economist and Ukraine analyst, described the consolidation of Ukrainian economic power in the hands of a few "elite industrial tycoons", including Yanukovych's son
Oleksandr. The exact distribution of wealth and precise weight of influence are difficult to gauge, but most of the country's richest men were afraid to cross the Yanukovich family, even in cases where their own economic interests favored an economically pro-EU Ukraine. According to Åslund, one notable exception to the Yanukovych family's influence was
Petro Poroshenko, who is described as "uncommonly courageous", although his confectionery empire is less susceptible to ruin by the substantial power the Yanukovych family wielded in the heavy industry sectors located in Yanukovych's geographic power base of Donetsk. Authorities in Switzerland, Austria and Liechtenstein froze the assets of Yanukovych and his son Oleksander on 28 February 2014 pending a
money laundering investigation. Yanukovych has denied that he
embezzled funds and has said that his alleged foreign accounts do not exist.
Corporate raiding was rampant in Ukraine under Yanukovych's presidency. During that period, at least 7,000 Ukrainian companies were attacked by the oligarchic clan of Yanukovych (the so-called "Yanukovych Families"). This number includes both cases of the so-called Family entering the corporate rights of the firms they like by illegal methods, and "assaults" in order to obtain "tribute" – that is, commercial gain. This is evidenced by the data of the Anti-Raider Union of Entrepreneurs of Ukraine. The victims of Yanukovych's raider methods were offered to pay a regular "tribute" in the amount of 30–50% of the company's profits – or to cede ownership of it. According to Yanukovych's former ally
Taras Chornovil, a group of officials and businessmen close to Yanukovych, composed of
Serhiy Lyovochkin,
Valeriy Khoroshkovskyi,
Dmytro Firtash and
Yuriy Boyko, were involved in deals with Russian president Putin and criminal boss
Semion Mogilevich related to the purchase of Russian gas.
Personal excesses Yanukovych abandoned his estate
Mezhyhirya when he fled the capital. The estate is located in a former forest preserve on the outskirts of Kyiv. Officially, Yanukovych claimed to own a modest home of roughly 250 square meters near the perimeter of the Mezhyhirya grounds, which he made available for journalist interviews. His actual residence, however, was a vast, enclosed estate of approximately 350 acres – nearly half the area of New York's
Central Park. He had acquired the property in 2007, according to critics, through a convoluted series of companies and transactions. Yanukovych did not reveal the price he paid, although he called it a "very serious price". Mezhyhirya is estimated to have been sold for more than 75 million U.S. dollars. In a feature with photos on Yanukovych's Mezhyhirya mansion,
Serhiy Leshchenko notes "For most of [Yanukovych's] career he was a public servant or parliament deputy, where his salary never exceeded 2000 US dollars per month." Under a photo showing the new home's ornate ceiling, Leschenko remarks, "In a country where 35% of the population live under poverty line, spending 100,000 dollars on each individual chandelier seems excessive, to say the least." Crowned with a pure copper roof, the mansion was the largest wooden structure ever created by Finnish log home builder
Honka, whose representative suggested to Yanukovych that it be nominated for the
Guinness Book of Records. When the former president departed, 35 cars and seven motorbikes were left behind. Kyiv's District Court seized 27 vintage cars in 2016 from the fleet stationed at Mezhyhirya, some worth more than $US 1 million. Yanukovych told
BBC Newsnight (in June 2015) that stories that Mezhyhirya cost the Ukrainian taxpayer millions of dollars were "political technology and
spin" and that the estate did not belong to him personally; he claimed that the ostriches in the residence's petting zoo "just happened to be there" and remarked "I supported the ostriches, what's wrong with that?".
Economy, finance and social sphere Tax policy '' activists protesting Yanukovych's tax reform in 2010 On 30 November 2010, Yanukovych vetoed a new tax code made by the Azarov Government and earlier approved by the Verkhovna Rada but protested against in rallies across Ukraine (one of the largest protests since the 2004 Orange Revolution). Yanukovych signed a new tax code on 3 December 2010.
Domestic spending vs. debt Yanukovych's Party of Regions wanted to increase social benefits, and raise salaries and pensions. In late 2009, a law that raised the minimum wage and pensions was passed in the Ukrainian Parliament. As a result of this, the
International Monetary Fund suspended its
2008–2009 Ukrainian financial crisis emergency lending programme. According to the IMF, the law breached promises to control spending. During the 2010 presidential campaign, Yanukovych had stated he would stand by this law. According to Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc member of parliament Oleh Shevchuk, Yanukovych broke this election promise just three days after the 2010 presidential election when only two lawmakers of Yanukovych's Party of Regions supported a bill to raise pensions for low-incomes.
Social policy A pension reform introduced under
IMF pressure in 2010 foresaw a gradual increase in pension age: 55 to 60 years for women and 60 to 65 years for men. However, it failed to address the significant discrepancy between pensions received by privileged groups such as retired officials and pensions of ordinary citizens. During Yanukovych's rule no substantial taxation was imposed on real estate and luxury items, meanwhile price hikes and austerity measures seriously affected the lower stratum of the population. Social benefit cuts for
Chernobyl rescue workers, small business owners and veterans of the
Soviet–Afghan War caused fierce protests in Kyiv in October/November 2011 by several thousand protesters.
Energy policy Gas trade with Russia According to Yanukovych,
relations between Ukraine and Russia in the gas sector were to be built "according to the rules of the market". He saw the gas agreement signed in 2009 after the
2009 Russia-Ukraine gas dispute as very unprofitable for Ukraine and wanted to "initiate the discussion of the most urgent gas issues" after the 2010 presidential election. This led to the April
2010 Ukrainian–Russian Naval Base for Natural Gas treaty. Yanukovych also promised to create a consortium that would allow Russia to jointly operate Ukraine's gas transportation network and pledged to help Russia build the
South Stream natural gas pipeline. As of June 2010, both did not happen.
Cultural and memorial policy Appointments in the sphere of culture Yanukovych's divisive stance in domestic issues, including controversial appointments and provocative decisions, led some analysts to call his policies
Ukrainophobic.
Dmytro Tabachnyk, who was appointed as
minister of education under Yanukovych, was described by analysts as an "outspoken Ukrainophobe", and his policies were blamed for the decrease in prestige of the
Ukrainian language.
Hanna Herman, the deputy head of Yanukovych's
presidential administration, acknowledged in an interview, that under his rule Ukrainian speakers were de-facto reduced to the position of second-rate citizens in comparison to
Russophone Ukrainians.
Legacy of WW2 Yanukovych stated that his "aim and dream" was to unify Ukraine, although in his opinion "there are already no borders between the East and West of the country today". He noted the importance of finding ways of reconciliation between
Ukrainians fighting on opposite sides in World War II in his speech at the ceremony to mark
Victory Day 2013. At the same time, Yanukovych's loyal majority in parliament engaged in actions which were evaluated as provocative and subversive to Ukrainian unity. On 21 April 2011 Verkhovna Rada adopted a proposal to hoist the
Soviet red flag on all official buildings and sites during Victory Day celebrations alongside the
national flag, despite the former banner's association with occupation, terror and genocide among many Ukrainians, especially in the western and central parts of the country. The decision was followed by clashes on 9 May in
Lviv, which emerged between local
nationalists and pro-Russian visitors from
Odesa and
Crimea. Yanukovych initially opted not to sign the decree on the red flag's official usage and condemned the violence in Lviv without blaming any of the sides in particular. On 20 May he finally signed the parliamentary decision on the official use of red flags, but on 17 June it was deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court.
Holodomor and Soviet repressions on 17 May 2010 near Memorial to the Holodomor Victims in Kyiv The
Soviet famine of 1932–33, called "Holodomor" in Ukrainian, claimed up to 10 million lives, mostly in Ukraine but also in some other parts of the Soviet Union, as peasants' food stocks were forcibly removed by
Stalin's regime via the
NKVD secret police. Yanukovych's stance on the
Holodomor was: "Holodomor took place, was denounced and the international society gave an evaluation of the
famine, but it was never labeled as a
genocide of the Ukrainian people. Ukraine's attempts to do so by blaming one of our neighbors are unjust." "The Holodomor was in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus and
Kazakhstan. It was the result of the policies of
Stalin's totalitarian regime." In 2003, he supported then President Kuchma's position that the Holodomor famine was genocide against Ukrainians.
Russian as an official language Yanukovych stated in the past that he wanted Russian to become the second
state language in Ukraine. Currently
Ukrainian is the only official language of Ukraine. On the other hand, he stated at a meeting with
Taras Shevchenko National Prize winners in Kyiv on 9 March 2010 that "Ukraine will continue to promote the Ukrainian language as its only state language". In a newspaper interview during the 2010 Ukrainian presidential election campaign, he stated that the status of Russian in Ukraine "is too politicized" and said that if elected president in 2010 he would "have a real opportunity to adopt a law on languages, which implements the requirements of the
European Charter of regional languages". He said that this law would need 226 votes in the
Ukrainian parliament (half of the votes instead of two-thirds of the votes needed to change the constitution of Ukraine) and that voters told him that the current status of
Russian in Ukraine created "problems in the hospital, school, university, in the courts, in the office". Effective in August 2012,
a new law on regional languages entitles any local language spoken by at least a 10% minority be declared official within that area. On 23 February 2014, following the
Revolution of Dignity, a bill was passed by the parliament which would have abolished the law on regional languages, making Ukrainian the sole state language at all levels. This bill was blocked by acting president
Turchynov, until a replacement bill is ready. The 2012 law was ruled unconstitutional and was struck down by the
Constitutional Court of Ukraine in 2018, 4 years after the
Euromaidan.
Religion of the
Russian Orthodox Church in
Chersonesus,
Crimea, 2013 In a late July 2013 speech Yanukovych stated: "All
churches and religious organizations are equal for the state. We respect the choice of our citizens and guarantee everyone's Constitutional right to
freedom of religion. We will not allow the use of churches and religious organizations by some political forces for their narrow interests. This also refers to foreign centres through which religious organizations sometimes seek to affect the internal political situation in Ukraine. This is a matter of the state's national security". Under Yanukovych's presidency instances of intimidation against Ukrainian priests and believers, aimed with forcing them to join the
Moscow Patriarchate favoured by the president, were reported.
Foreign policy is greeted by Yanukovych in Kyiv, Ukraine, on 2 July 2010. talks with President Viktor Yanukovych during a pull aside at the
2012 Nuclear Security Summit at the Coex Center in
Seoul. greets Yanukovych upon his arrival to the
Planalto Palace in
Brasília, Brazil, on 25 October 2011. , 3 February 2011
Relations with EU and NATO Yanukovych said, "Ukraine's integration with the EU remains our strategic aim", with a "balanced policy, which will protect our national interests both on our eastern border – I mean with Russia – and of course with the European Union". According to Yanukovych, Ukraine must be a "
neutral state" which should be part of a "collective defence system which the European Union, NATO and Russia will take part in." Yanukovych wants Ukraine to "neither join NATO nor the
CSTO". He stated on 7 January 2010 that Ukraine is ready to consider an initiative by
Dmitry Medvedev on the creation of a new Europe collective security system "The Ukrainian people don't currently support Ukraine's entry to NATO and this corresponds to the status that we currently have. We don't want to join any military bloc". Yanukovych's first foreign visit was to
Brussels to visit the
president of the European Council,
Herman Van Rompuy, and the EU Foreign Affairs chief, Catherine Ashton. During the visit Yanukovych stated that there would be no change to Ukraine's status as a member of the
NATO outreach program.
Relations with Russia In comparison to his predecessors, Yanukovych's foreign policy was characterized by a much stronger pro-Moscow orientation, which included signing of one-sided deals with Russia and rose the question of a possible
Russian intelligence lobby in the Ukrainian government. During his second foreign visit to Moscow in March, Yanukovych vowed to end years of acrimony with Russia, saying that ties between Russia and Ukraine "should never be the way they were for the past five years". He indicated that he was open to compromise with Russia on the
Black Sea Fleet's future (this led to the April 2010 Ukrainian–Russian Naval Base for Natural Gas treaty), and reiterated that Ukraine would remain a "European, non-aligned state", referring to NATO membership.
Russian president Medvedev (April 2010) and
Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin (June 2010) soon stated they noticed a big improvement in relations with Ukraine since Yanukovych's presidency. Yanukovych rejected accusations that improvement of
Ukrainian-Russian relations harmed
relations with the European Union. "Our policy is directed to protection of our national interests. We do not live in a fairy tale and understand that our partners also defend their interests". In February 2012, Yanukovych stated, referring to
relations with Russia, "It is not wise to fall asleep next to a
big bear". On 3 June 2010, the Ukrainian parliament excluded, in a bill written by Yanukovych, with 226 votes, Ukrainian membership of any military bloc, but allowed for co-operation with military alliances such as NATO. A day later Yanukovych stated that the recognition of the independence of
Abkhazia, South Ossetia and
Kosovo violates international law, "I have never recognized Abkhazia, South Ossetia or Kosovo's independence. This is a violation of international law". In May 2011
Ukraine's foreign ministry called its Russian counterpart to tone down "
anti-Ukrainian hysteria" in the Russian media and blamed some Russian politicians of attempting to "divide peoples". In June 2011 a "minor clash" emerged between Ukrainian and Russian
PACE deputies in
Strasbourg after the latter sponsored a resolution blaming Ukraine and four other European countries of "
Neo-Nazism" and "right-wing radicalism". Both members of the Ukrainian opposition and MPs from the governing Party of Regions spoke against the document.
European integration Before his election Yanukovych stated that he wanted to create a
free trade zone and
visa-free regime with the EU as soon as possible. On 22 November 2010, the
European Council and Ukraine announced "an action plan for Ukraine toward the establishment of a visa-free regime for short-stay travel". In May 2011, Yanukovych stated that he would strive for Ukraine to join the EU. Yanukovych's stance towards integration with the EU, according to
The Economist, led him to be "seen in Moscow as a traitor", a reversal of the 2004 presidential election where Moscow openly supported Yanukovych.
Crimean naval base , 2010 On 21 April 2010, in
Kharkiv, Yanukovych and Medvedev signed the
2010 Ukrainian–Russian Naval Base for Natural Gas treaty, whereby the Russian lease on naval facilities in Crimea would be extended beyond 2017 by 25 years with an additional 5-year renewal option (to 2042–47) in exchange for a multi-year discounted contract to provide Ukraine with Russian natural gas. This treaty was approved by both the
Russian and Ukrainian parliaments (Verkhovna Rada) on 27 April 2010. On 22 April 2010, Yanukovych stated he did not rule out the possibility of holding a
referendum on the stationing of the
Russian Black Sea Fleet in Ukraine after the necessary legislative framework is adopted for this in future. Yanukovych did plan to hold plebiscites also on other subjects. Opposition members accused Yanukovych of "selling out national interests".
2012 parliamentary elections is in blue. On 17 November 2011, the Ukrainian parliament adopted a new electoral law, which re-established the mixed system, under which half of the deputies were elected according to
first-past-the-post principle, and half on the base of
proportional representation. The law banned
electoral blocs from participating in the election. Both amendments were claimed by analysts to bring additional advantage to the governing Party of Regions. The project of the law had been criticized by international watchdogs as being detrimental to political climate in Ukraine. In advance to the
2012 Ukrainian parliamentary election Yanukovych predicted that "social standards will continue to grow" and "improvement of administrative services system will continue". Yanukovych announced $2 billion worth of pension and other welfare increases on 7 March 2012. In the October election Yanukovych's party of Regions won the poll with 30% against 25.5% for imprisoned Yulia Tymoshenko's
Fatherland party. ==Downfall==