Early history The story of the creation of the Druze faith in the days between 1017 and 1018 is dominated by three men and their struggle for influence. •
Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad was an Ismaili mystic and scholar from
Khorasan, who arrived in Fatimid Egypt in 1014 or 1016, and began to preach a
Muwaḥḥidūn ("Unitarian") doctrine. •
Muhammad bin Ismail Nashtakin ad-Darazi arrived in Cairo in 1015 or 1017, possibly from
Bukhara, joined the movement and became an important preacher.
Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad arrives in Cairo Hamza ibn Ali ibn Ahmad, an Ismaili mystic and scholar from
Zozan,
Khorasan, in the
Samanid Empire, arrived in Fatimid Egypt in 1014 or 1016. In 1017, Hamza began to preach a
Muwaḥḥidūn (Unitarian) doctrine. Hamza gained the support of the Fātimid caliph
al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah, who issued a decree promoting religious freedom and eventually became a central figure in the Druze faith. He arrived in Cairo in 1015, or 1017, after which he joined the newly emerged Druze movement. Al-Darazi was converted early to the Unitarian faith and became one of its early preachers. At that time, the movement enlisted a large number of adherents. As the number of his followers grew, he became obsessed with his leadership and gave himself the title "The Sword of the Faith". Al-Darazi argued that he should be the leader of the
daʻwah rather than Hamza ibn Ali and gave himself the title "Lord of the Guides" because Caliph al-Hakim referred to Hamza as "Guide of the Consented". It is said that al-Darazi allowed wine, forbidden marriages and taught
metempsychosis It promoted absolute
monotheism and the concepts of supporting your fellow man, true speech and pursuit of oneness with God. These concepts superseded all
ritual, law and
dogma and requirements for
pilgrimage,
fasting,
holy days,
prayer, charity,
devotion,
creed and particular worship of any prophet or person was downplayed.
Sharia was opposed and Druze traditions started during the call continue today, such as meeting for reading, prayer and social gathering on a Thursday instead of a Friday at
Khalwats instead of mosques. Such gatherings and traditions were not compulsory and people were encouraged to pursue a state of compliance with the real law of nature governing the universe. Epistle thirteen of the
Epistles of Wisdom called it "A spiritual doctrine without any ritualistic imposition". The time of the call was seen as a revolution of truth, with
missionaries preaching its message all around the Middle East. These messengers were sent out with the Druze epistles and took written
vows from believers, whose
souls are thought to still exist in the Druze of today. The souls of those who took the vows during the call are believed to be continuously reincarnating in successive generations of Druze until the return of al-Hakim to proclaim a second Divine call and establish a
Golden Age of
justice and
peace for all.
al-Darazi is executed By 1018, al-Darazi had gathered around him partisans—"Darazites"—who believed that
universal reason became incarnated in
Adam at the beginning of the world, was then passed to the prophets, then into Ali, and then into his descendants, the Fatimid Caliphs.
Disappearance of Al-Hakim Al-Hakim disappeared one night while on his evening ride—presumably assassinated, perhaps at the behest of his formidable elder sister
Sitt al-Mulk. The Druze believe he went into
Occultation with Hamza ibn Ali and three other prominent preachers, leaving the care of the "Unitarian missionary movement" to a new leader, al-Muqtana Baha'uddin. The call was suspended briefly between 19 May 1018 and 9 May 1019 during the
apostasy of al-Darazi and again between 1021 and 1026 during a period of persecution by the
Fatimid caliph al-Zahir li-I'zaz Din Allah for those who had sworn the
oath to accept the call. Persecutions started forty days after the disappearance into Occultation of al-Hakim, who was thought to have been converting people to the Unitarian faith for over twenty years prior. Al-Hakim convinced some heretical followers such as al-Darazi of his
soteriological divinity and officially declared the Divine call after issuing a decree promoting religious freedom. This was the result of a power struggle inside of the Fatimid Calphate, in which the Druze were viewed with suspicion because they refused to recognize the new caliph as their Imam. Many spies, mainly the followers of al-Darazi, joined the Unitarian movement to infiltrate the Druze community. The spies set about agitating trouble and soiling the reputation of the Druze. This resulted in friction with the new caliph who clashed militarily with the Druze community. The clashes ranged from
Antioch to
Alexandria, where tens of thousands of Druze were slaughtered by the Fatimid army, The largest massacre was at Antioch, where 5000 prominent Druze were killed, followed by that of
Aleppo. These sources assert that al-Hakim rejected al-Darazi's claims of divinity,
During the Crusades Wadi al-Taym, in
Lebanon, was one of the two most important centers of Druze missionary activity in the 11th century and was the first area where the Druze appeared in the historical record under the name "Druze". It is generally considered the birthplace of the Druze faith. It was during the period of Crusader rule in Levant (1099–1291) that the Druze first emerged into the full light of history in the Gharb region of the
Chouf. As powerful warriors serving the leaders in
Damascus against the
Crusades, the Druze were given the task of keeping watch over the Crusaders in the seaport of
Beirut, to prevent them from making any encroachments inland. Subsequently, the Druze chiefs of the Gharb placed their considerable military experience at the disposal of the
Mamluk sultans in Egypt (1250–1516); first, to assist them in putting an end to what remained of Crusader rule in the coastal Levant, and later to help them safeguard the Lebanese coast against Crusader retaliation by sea. In the early period of the Crusader era, the Druze feudal power was in the hands of two families, the
Tanukhs and the
Arslans. From their fortresses in the Gharb area (now in
Aley District of southern
Mount Lebanon Governorate), the Tanukhs led their incursions into the Phoenician coast and finally succeeded in holding Beirut and the marine plain against the
Franks. Because of their fierce battles with the Crusaders, the Druze earned the respect of the
Sunni caliphs and thus gained important political powers. After the middle of the twelfth century, the
Maan family superseded the Tanukhs in Druze leadership. The origin of the family goes back to Prince Ma'an, who made his appearance in Lebanon in the days of the Abbasid caliph
al-Mustarshid (1118–35). The Ma'ans chose for their abode the Chouf in south-western Lebanon (southern
Mount Lebanon Governorate), overlooking the maritime plain between
Beirut and
Sidon, and made their headquarters in
Baaqlin, which is still a leading Druze village. They were invested with feudal authority by Sultan
Nur ad-Din Zengi and furnished respectable contingents to the Muslim ranks in their struggle against the Crusaders. Certain aspects of the faith, such as
transmigration of souls between adherents and
incarnation, were viewed as
heretical or
kufr (
infidelity) and foreign by Sunni and Shia Muslims, but contributed to solidarity among the Druze, who closed their religion to new converts in 1046 due to the threat of persecution. The
proto-Salafi thinker
ibn Taymiyya believed the Druze had a high level of infidelity besides being
apostates. Thus, they were not trustworthy and should not be forgiven. He taught also that Muslims cannot accept Druze penitence nor keep them alive, and that Druze property should be confiscated and their women
enslaved. Having cleared the
Holy Land of the Crusaders, the Mamluk Sultanate now turned their attention to the schismatic Muslims of Syria. In 1305, after the issuing of a
fatwa by the scholar ibn Taymiyya calling for
jihad against all non-Sunni Muslim groups like the Druze,
Alawites, Isma'ilis, and
Twelver Shi'a,
al-Nasir Muhammad inflicted a disastrous defeat on the Druze at
Keserwan, and forced outward compliance on their part to Sunnism. The
Sunni Mamluk campaigns led to the destruction of many Christian churches and monasteries and Druze sanctuaries
khilwat, and caused mass destruction of
Maronite and Druze villages and the killings and mass displacement of its inhabitants.
Lebanese Sunni authors generally write of the campaigns from a pro-Mamluk stance, seeing in them the legitimate Muslim state's efforts to incorporate Mount Lebanon into the Islamic realm, while Druze authors write with a focus on the Druze community's consistent connection to
Mount Lebanon and defense of its practical autonomy. Later, the Druze were severely attacked at
Saoufar in the
1585 Ottoman expedition against the Druze after the Ottomans claimed that the Druze had assaulted their caravans near
Tripoli. As a result of the Ottoman experience with the rebellious Druze, the word
Durzi in
Turkish came to mean ‘someone who is the ultimate thug'. The 16th and 17th centuries witnessed a succession of armed Druze rebellions against the Ottomans countered by repeated Ottoman punitive expeditions against the Chouf, in which the Druze population of the area was severely depleted and many villages destroyed. These military measures, severe as they were, did not succeed in reducing the local Druze to the required degree of subordination. This led the Ottoman government to agree to an arrangement whereby the different
nahiyahs (districts) of the Chouf would be granted in
iltizam ("fiscal concession") to one of the region's
amirs, or leading chiefs, leaving the maintenance of law and order and the collection of taxes in the area in the hands of the appointed amir. This arrangement was to provide the cornerstone for the privileged status ultimately enjoyed by the whole of Mount Lebanon, Druze and Christian areas alike. Fakhr-al-Din II was the first ruler in modern Lebanon to open the doors of his country to foreign Western influences. Under his auspices the French established a khān (hostel) in Sidon, the
Florentines a consulate, and Christian missionaries were admitted into the country. Beirut and Sidon, which Fakhr-al-Din II beautified, still bear traces of his benign rule. See the new biography of this Prince, based on original sources, by TJ Gorton:
Renaissance Emir: a Druze Warlord at the Court of the Medici (London, Quartet Books, 2013), for an updated view of his life. Fakhr ad Din II was succeeded in 1635 by his nephew
Mulhim Ma'n, who ruled through his death in 1658. (Fakhr ad Din's only surviving son, Husayn, lived the rest of his life as a court official in Constantinople.) Emir Mulhim exercised
Iltizam taxation rights in the Shuf, Gharb, Jurd, Matn, and Kisrawan districts of Lebanon. Mulhim's forces battled and defeated those of Mustafa Pasha,
Beylerbey of Damascus, in 1642, but he is reported by historians to have been otherwise loyal to Ottoman rule. Following Mulhim's death, his sons
Ahmad and Korkmaz entered into a
power struggle with other Ottoman-backed Druze leaders. In 1660, the Ottoman Empire moved to reorganize the region, placing the
sanjaks (districts) of Sidon-Beirut and Safed in a newly formed
province of Sidon, a move seen by local Druze as an attempt to assert control. Ahmad however emerged victorious in the
power struggle among the Druze in 1667, but the Maʿnīs lost control of Safad Ahmad continued as local ruler through his death from natural causes, without heir, in 1697. During the
Ottoman–Habsburg War (1683–1699), Ahmad Ma'n collaborated in a rebellion against the Ottomans which extended beyond his death. Having consolidated his conquests in Syria (1831–1838),
Ibrahim Pasha, son of the viceroy of Egypt,
Muhammad Ali Pasha, made the fatal mistake of trying to disarm the Christians and Druze of the Lebanon and to draft the latter into his army. This was contrary to the principles of the life of independence which these mountaineers had always lived, and resulted in a general uprising against Egyptian rule. The Druze of Wadi al-Taym and Ḥawran, under the leadership of Shibli al-Aryan, distinguished themselves in their stubborn resistance at their inaccessible headquarters,
al-Laja, lying southeast of Damascus.
Qaysites and the Yemenites , about the control of Jebel Druze The conquest of Syria by the Muslim Arabs in the middle of the seventh century introduced into the land two political factions later called the Qaysites and the
Yemenites. The Qaysite party represented the
Bedouin Arabs who were regarded as inferior by the Yemenites who were earlier and more cultured emigrants into Syria from southern Arabia. Druze and Christians grouped in political, rather than religious, parties; the party lines in Lebanon obliterated ethnic and religious lines and the people grouped themselves into one or the other of these two parties regardless of their religious affiliations. The sanguinary feuds between these two factions depleted, in course of time, the manhood of the Lebanon and ended in the decisive
battle of Ain Dara in 1711, which resulted in the utter defeat of the Yemenite party. Many Yemenite Druze thereupon migrated to the
Hauran region, laying the foundation of Druze power there. The Qays were led by Emir Haydar of the
Shihab dynasty and consisted of the Druze clans of
Jumblatt, Talhuq, Imad and Abd al-Malik and the
Maronite clan of
Khazen. The Yamani faction was led by Mahmoud Abu Harmoush and consisted of the Druze
Alam al-Din,
Arslan and
Sawaf clans. The Yamani faction also had backing from the Ottoman provincial authorities of
Sidon and
Damascus. The battle ended in a rout of the Yamani faction and resulted in the consolidation of Qaysi political and fiscal domination over
Mount Lebanon. with amicable relations between the two groups prevailing throughout history, with the exception of some periods, including
1860 civil conflict in Mount Lebanon and Damascus. In 1840, social disturbances started between Druze and their
Christian Maronite neighbors, who had previously been on friendly terms. This culminated in the civil war of 1860. After the
Shehab dynasty converted to Christianity, some prominent Druze families, including the Druze Abi-Lamma clan—who were close allies of the Shihabs—also converted to Christianity and joined the
Maronite Church. The Druze community and feudal leaders came under attack from the regime with the collaboration of the
Maronite Catholic Church, and the Druze lost most of their political and feudal powers. Also, the Druze formed an alliance with
Britain and allowed
Protestant missionaries to enter Mount Lebanon, creating tension between them and the Catholic Maronites. The Maronite-Druze conflict in 1840–60 was an outgrowth of the Maronite independence movement, directed against the Druze, Druze feudalism, and the Ottoman-Turks. The civil war was not therefore a religious war, except in Damascus, where it spread and where the vastly non-Druze population was
anti-Christian. This animosity was fueled by economic disparities, with Christians, who were generally wealthier and more prosperous, compare to the economically struggling Muslim residents. The movement culminated with the 1859–60 massacre and defeat of the Maronites by the Druze. The civil war of 1860 cost the Maronites some ten thousand lives in
Damascus,
Zahlé,
Deir al-Qamar,
Hasbaya, and other towns of Lebanon. The European powers then determined to intervene, and authorized the landing in Beirut of a body of French troops under
General Beaufort d'Hautpoul, whose inscription can still be seen on the historic rock at the mouth of
Nahr al-Kalb. French intervention on behalf of the Maronites did not help the Maronite national movement, since France was restricted in 1860 by the British government, which did not want the
Ottoman Empire dismembered. But European intervention pressured the Turks to treat the Maronites more justly. Following the recommendations of the powers, the Ottoman Porte granted Lebanon local autonomy, guaranteed by the powers, under a Maronite governor. This autonomy was maintained until World War I. The
Maronite Catholics and the Druze founded modern Lebanon in the early eighteenth century, through the ruling and social system known as the "Maronite-Druze dualism" which developed in Ottoman-era Mount Lebanon Mutasarrifate, The ruling and social system in the
Mount Lebanon Mutasarrifate was formed from the Maronite-Druze dualism, and the security stability and Druze-Maronite coexistence in the Mutasarrifate allowed the development of the economy and the system of government. Al-Farouqi also disarmed the population, extracted significant taxes, and launched a census of the region. == Modern history ==