Evola's writings blended ideas from
German idealism,
Eastern doctrines,
traditionalist conservatism, and especially the interwar
Conservative Revolution, "with which Evola had a deep personal involvement". He viewed himself as part of an aristocratic
caste that had been dominant in an ancient Golden Age, as opposed to the contemporary Dark Age (the
Kali Yuga). In his writing, Evola addressed others in that caste whom he called ''l'uomo differenziato''—"the man who has become different"—who through heredity and initiation were able to transcend the ages. Evola considered
human history to be, in general,
decadent; he viewed modernity as the temporary success of the forces of disorder over tradition. Tradition, in Evola's definition, was an eternal supernatural knowledge, with absolute values of authority, hierarchy, order, discipline and obedience. Matthew Rose wrote that "Evola claimed to show how basic human activities—from eating and sex, commerce and games, to war and social intercourse—were elevated by Tradition into something ritualistic, becoming activities whose very repetitiveness offered a glimpse of an unchanging eternal realm". Ensuring Tradition's triumph of order over chaos, in Evola's view, required an obedience to aristocracy. Rose wrote that Evola "aspired to be the most right-wing thinker possible in the modern world". Evola's philosophical work started in the 1920s with
The Theory of the Absolute Individual and ''Phenomenology of the Absolute Individual. Teoria dell'individuo assoluto
(Theory of The Absolute Individual
) and Fenomenologia dell'individuo assoluto
(Phenomenology of the Absolute Individual)
originally constituted a single work which only for editorial reasons ended up being divided into two separate volumes, published a few years apart from each other, one in 1927 and the other in 1930, published in Turin at the publisher called Bocca.
This work was different and even attack on the dominant Hegelian thought in Italy, prevailed by the works of Benedetto Croce. He helped Evola to find a publisher for his Theory and Phenomenology of Absolute Individual,'' a work which started in 1924 but was only published in its final form in 1927 and 1930, though it is not certain to which extent Croce helped Evola. Evola wrote prodigiously on
mysticism,
Tantra,
Hermeticism, the myth of the
Holy Grail and
Western esotericism. German Egyptologist and scholar of esotericism Florian Ebeling noted that Evola's
The Hermetic Tradition is viewed as an "extremely important work" on Hermeticism for esotericists. Evola gave particular focus to Cesare della Riviera's text
Il Mondo Magico degli Heroi, which he later republished in modern Italian. He held that Riviera's text was consonant with the goals of "high magic"the reshaping of the earthly human into a transcendental 'god man'. According to Evola, the alleged "timeless" Traditional science was able to come to lucid expression through this text, in spite of the "coverings" added to it to prevent accusations from the church. Though Evola rejected
Carl Jung's interpretation of alchemy, Jung described Evola's
The Hermetic Tradition as a "magisterial account of Hermetic philosophy". In
Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition, the philosopher Glenn Alexander Magee favoured Evola's interpretation over that of Jung's. In 1988 a journal devoted to Hermetic thought published a section of Evola's book and described it as "Luciferian." Evola later confessed that he was not a Buddhist, and that his text on Buddhism was meant to balance out his earlier work on the Hindu
tantras. Evola often relied on European sources about Asian creeds while evoking them for racist ends, Peter Staudenmaier wrote. Rose described Evola as an "unreliable scholar of Eastern religions." Evola advocated that "differentiated individuals" following the
left-hand path use dark violent sexual powers against the modern world. For Evola, these "virile heroes" are both generous and cruel, possess the ability to rule, and commit "Dionysian" acts that might be seen as conventionally immoral. For Evola, the left-hand path embraces violence as a means of transgression. Women would find their true identity in total subjugation to men. Evola regarded matriarchy and goddess religions as a symptom of decadence, and preferred a
hypermasculine warrior
ethos. He was influenced by
Hans Blüher, a proponent of the
Männerbund ('alliance of men') concept as a model for his "warrior-band" or "warrior-society". Goodrick-Clarke noted the fundamental influence of
Otto Weininger's book
Sex and Character on Evola's dualism of male-female spirituality. According to Goodrick-Clarke, "Evola's celebration of virile spirituality was rooted in Weininger's work, which was widely translated by the end of the First World War." Evola denounced
homosexuality as "useless" for his purposes. He did not neglect
sadomasochism, so long as sadism and masochism "are magnifications of an element potentially present in the deepest essence of
eros." Then, it would be possible to "extend, in a transcendental and perhaps
ecstatic way, the possibilities of sex." Evola held that women "played" with men, threatened their masculinity, and lured them into a "constrictive" grasp with their sexuality. He wrote that "It should not be expected of women that they return to what they really are ... when men themselves retain only the semblance of true virility", Evola also said that the "ritual violation of virgins", and "whipping women" were a means of "consciousness raising", so long as these practices were done to the intensity required to produce the proper "liminal psychic climate". Evola translated Weininger's
Sex and Character into Italian. Dissatisfied with simply translating Weininger's work, he wrote the text
Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex (1958), where his views on sexuality were dealt with at length.
Arthur Versluis described this text as Evola's "most interesting" work aside from
Revolt Against the Modern World (1934). This book remains popular among many 'New Age' adherents.
Race Evola's views on
race had roots in his aristocratic elitism. According to the European studies professor Paul Furlong, Evola developed what he called "the law of the regression of castes" in
Revolt Against the Modern World and other writings on racism from the 1930s and the Second World War. In Evola's view "power and civilization have progressed from one to another of the four castes—sacred leaders, warrior nobility, bourgeoisie (economy, 'merchants') and slaves". Furlong explains: "for Evola, the core of racial superiority lay in the spiritual qualities of the higher castes, which expressed themselves in physical as well as in cultural features, but were not determined by them. The law of the regression of castes places racism at the core of Evola's philosophy, since he sees an increasing predominance of lower races as directly expressed through modern mass democracies." Evola used "a man of race" to mean "a man of breeding". and "esoteric-traditionalist racism". The book was endorsed by
Benito Mussolini. Prior to the end of the Second World War, Evola frequently used the term "Aryan" to refer to the nobility, who in his view were imbued with traditional spirituality. Feinstein writes that this interpretation made the term "Aryan" more plausible in an Italian context and thereby furthered antisemitism in Fascist Italy. Evola's interpretation was adopted by Mussolini, who declared in 1938 that "Italy's civilization is Aryan". Wolff notes that Evola seems to have stopped writing about race in 1945, but adds that the intellectual themes of Evola's writings were otherwise unchanged. Evola continued to write about elitism and his contempt for the weak. His "doctrine of the Aryan-Roman super-race was simply restated as a doctrine of the 'leaders of men' ... no longer with reference to the SS, but to the mediaeval Teutonic knights or the Knights Templar, already mentioned in [his book] Rivolta." Evola wrote of "inferior, non-European races". He believed that military aggressions such as
Fascist Italy's 1935 invasion of Ethiopia were justified by Italy's dominance, outweighing concerns he had about the possibility of
race-mixing. Richard H. Drake wrote, "Evola was never prepared to discount the value of blood altogether". Evola wrote: "a certain balanced consciousness and dignity of race can be considered healthy" in a time when "the exaltation of the negro and all the rest, anticolonialist psychosis and integrationist fanaticism [are] all parallel phenomena in the decline of Europe and the West." Furlong wrote that a 1957 article by Evola about America "leaves no doubt as to his deep prejudice against black people".
"Spiritual racism" Evola's
racism included racism of the body, soul, and spirit, giving primacy to the latter factor, writing that "races only declined when their spirit failed." Like Evola, Clauss believed that physical race and spiritual race could diverge as a consequence of
miscegenation. Peter Staudenmaier notes that many other racists of the time found Evola's "spiritual racism" perplexing. Like
René Guénon, Evola believed that mankind is living in the
Kali Yuga of
Hinduism—the Dark Age of unleashed materialistic appetites. He argued that both Italian fascism and
Nazism represented hope that the "celestial"
Aryan race would be reconstituted. He drew on mythological accounts of super-races and their decline, particularly the
Hyperboreans, and maintained that traces of Hyperborean influence could be felt in Aryan men. He felt that Aryan men had devolved from these higher mythological races. Gregor noted that several contemporary criticisms of Evola's theory were published: "In one of Fascism's most important theoretical journals, Evola's critic pointed out that many Nordic-Aryans, not to speak of Mediterranean Aryans, fail to demonstrate any Hyperborean properties. Instead, they make obvious their materialism, their sensuality, their indifference to loyalty and sacrifice, together with their consuming greed. How do they differ from 'inferior' races, and why should anyone wish, in any way, to favor them?" Concerning the relationship between "spiritual racism" and biological racism, Evola put forth the following viewpoint, which Furlong described as pseudo-scientific: "The factor of 'blood' or 'race' has its importance, because it is not psychologically—in the brain or the opinions of the individual—but in the very deepest forces of life that traditions live and act as typical formative energies. Blood registers the effects of this action, and indeed offers through heredity, a matter that is already refined and pre-formed ..."
Antisemitism Writings by Evola in the late 1930s contributed arguments for Fascist Italy's repression of its Jews. Evola encouraged and applauded Mussolini's antisemitic
racial laws in 1938, and called for a "supreme Aryan elite" to oppose the Jews. In some writings, Evola called Jews a virus. He said Fascism and Nazism's final victory over Jews would end "the spiritual decadence of the West" and thereby "re-establish genuine contact between man and a transcendent, supersensible reality". Evola wrote the foreword and an essay in the second Italian edition of the infamous
antisemitic fabrication The Protocols of the Elders of Zion published in 1938 by the Catholic fascist
Giovanni Preziosi. In it, Evola argued that the
Protocols—whether or not a forgery—"contain the plan for an occult war, whose objective is the utter destruction, in the non-Jewish peoples, of all tradition, class, aristocracy, and hierarchy, and of all moral, religious, and spiritual values." He was an admirer of
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the antisemitic leader of the fascist Romanian
Iron Guard. After Codreanu was assassinated in 1938 on orders from
King Carol II, Evola railed against "the Judaic horde" that he accused of planning "Talmudic, Israelite tyranny." Evola's antisemitism did not emphasise the Nazi conception of Jews as "representatives of a biological race", but rather as "the carriers of a world view, a way of being and thinking—simply put, a spirit—that corresponded to the 'worst' and 'most decadent' features of modernity: democracy, egalitarianism and materialism", Wolff writes. According to Wolff, "Evola's 'totalitarian' or 'spiritual' racism was no milder than Nazi biological racism", and Evola was trying to promote an "Italian version of racism and antisemitism, one that could be integrated into the Fascist project to create a New Man". Evola dismissed the biological racism of chief Nazi theorist
Alfred Rosenberg and others as reductionist and materialistic. He also argued that one could be "Aryan" but have a "Jewish" soul, and could be "Jewish" but have an "Aryan" soul. In Evola's view,
Otto Weininger and
Carlo Michelstaedter were Jews of "sufficiently heroic, ascetic, and sacral" character to fit the latter category. In 1970, Evola described
Adolf Hitler's antisemitism as a paranoid
idée fixe that damaged the reputation of the
Third Reich. But Evola never clearly acknowledged the
Holocaust committed by the regimes he associated with, perpetrated in the name of racism—Furlong called this a "fatal lapse that by itself ought to be enough to destroy his authority". == Written works ==