Political leaders have at their disposal a great deal of patronage, in the sense that they make decisions on the appointment of
officials inside and outside government (for example on
quangos in the UK). Patronage is therefore a recognized power of the
executive branch. In most countries, the executive has the right to make many appointments, some of which may be lucrative (see also
sinecures). In some
democracies, high-level appointments are reviewed or approved by the
legislature (as in the
advice and consent of the
United States Senate); in other countries, such as those using the
Westminster system, this is not the case. Other types of political patronage may violate the laws or ethics codes, such as when political leaders engage in
nepotism (hiring family members) and
cronyism such as fraudulently awarding non-competitive government contracts to friends or relatives or pressuring the public service to hire an unqualified family member or friend.
Philippines Political patronage, also known as "
padrino system", has been the source of many controversies and
corruption. It has been regarded as an
open secret that one cannot join the
political arena of the Philippines without mastery of the padrino system. From the lowest
barangay official to the
President of the Republic, it is expected that one gains political debts and dispenses political favor to advance one's career or gain influence if not wealth.
Russia After
Soviet leader
Vladimir Lenin retired from politics in March 1923 following a stroke, a power struggle began between
Soviet Premier Alexei Rykov,
Pravda editor
Nikolai Bukharin,
Profintern leader
Mikhail Tomsky,
Red Army founder
Leon Trotsky, former Premier
Lev Kamenev,
Comintern leader
Grigory Zinoviev, and
General Secretary Joseph Stalin. Stalin used patronage to appoint many Stalinist delegates (such as
Vyacheslav Molotov,
Lazar Kaganovich,
Grigory Ordzhonikidze, and
Mikhail Kalinin) to the
Party Politburo and
Sovnarkom in order to sway the votes in his favour, making Stalin the effective leader of the country by 1929.
South Africa In 2012, the African National Congress (ANC) mayor of Beaufort West in the Western Cape Province wrote a letter that openly and illegally solicited funds from the Construction Education and Training Authority for the ANC's 2016 election campaign. This episode, amongst many others including instances revolving around President Jacob Zuma, revealed how the African National Congress as ruling the political party utilized patronage to reward supporters and strengthen the leading faction of the party's control over governmental institutions.
United States In the
United States during the
Gilded Age, patronage became a controversial issue.
Tammany boss
William M. Tweed was an American politician who ran what is considered now to have been one of the most corrupt political machines in the country's history. Tweed and his corrupt associates ruled for a brief time with absolute power over the city and state of New York. At the height of his influence, Tweed was the third-largest landowner in
New York City, a director of the
Erie Railway, the
Tenth National Bank, and the New York Printing Company, as well as proprietor of the
Metropolitan Hotel. At times he was a member of the
United States House of Representatives, the New York City Board of Advisors, and the
New York State Senate. In 1873, Tweed was convicted for diverting between $40 million and $200 million of public monies. Six months after
James Garfield became
president in 1881,
Charles J. Guiteau, a disappointed office-seeker, assassinated him. To prevent further political violence and to assuage public outrage, Congress passed the
Pendleton Act in 1883, which set up the
Civil Service Commission. Henceforth, applicants for most federal government jobs would have to pass an examination. Federal politicians' influence over bureaucratic appointments waned, and patronage declined as a national political issue. Beginning in 1969, a Supreme Court case in Chicago,
Michael L. Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, occurred involving political patronage and its constitutionality. Shakman claimed that much of the patronage going on in Chicago politics was unlawful on the grounds of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Through a series of legal battles and negotiations, the two parties agreed upon
The Shakman Decrees. Under these decrees, it was declared that the employment status of most public employees could not be affected positively or negatively based on political allegiance, with exceptions for politically inclined positions. The case is still in negotiation today, as there are points yet to be decided. Political patronage is not always considered corrupt. In the United States, the U.S. Constitution provides the president with the power to appoint individuals to government positions. The president also may appoint personal advisers without congressional approval. Not surprisingly, these individuals tend to be supporters of the president. Similarly, at the state and local levels, governors and mayors retain appointment powers. Some scholars have argued that patronage may be used for laudable purposes, such as the "recognition" of minority communities through the appointment of their members to a high-profile position. Bearfield has argued that patronage be used for four general purposes: to create or strengthen a political organization; achieve democratic or egalitarian goals; bridge political divisions and create coalitions, and alter the existing patronage system.
Venezuela Boliburguesía is a term that was coined by journalist Juan Carlos Zapata in order to "define the
oligarchy that has developed under the protection of the
Chavez government". During Hugo Chávez's tenure, he seized thousands of properties and businesses while also reducing the footprint of foreign companies. Venezuela's economy was then largely state-run and was operated by military officers who had their business and government affairs connected. Senior fellow at the
Brookings Institution, Harold Trinkunas, stated that involving the military in business was "a danger", with Trinkunas explaining that the Venezuelan military "has the greatest ability to coerce people, into business like they have". According to
Bloomberg Business, "[b]y showering contracts on former military officials and pro-government business executives, Chavez put a new face on the system of patronage". ==Science==