, Ink on paper
Japan Chinese legal institutions and the examination system began to heavily influence
Japan during the
Tang dynasty. In 728,
Sugawara no Kiyotomo took part in the Tang examinations. Near the end of the Tang era, Japan implemented the examination system, which lasted for some 200 years during the
Heian period (794–1185). According to the
Records of Palace Examinations, four
shinshi (
jinshi) passed the exams in 916: Fujiwara Takaki, Oue Koretoki, Harubuchi Yoshiki, and Fujiwara Harufusa. Poets such as
Sugawara no Michizane and Miyoshi Yoshimune mentioned their experiences with the examinations in their writing: Like the Chinese examinations, the curriculum revolved around the Confucian canon. As Japanese examinations developed, they diverged in practice from the Chinese ones. The
xiucai exams became more popular than the
jinshi because it was simpler and considered more practical. The Japanese examinations were also never opened to the common folk to the same extent as in China during the
Song dynasty. Due to aristocratic influence, by the 10th century, only students recommended based on their reputation and record of service could take the exams. While the exams were still held after the 11th century, they had lost all practical value, and any candidates who had been nominated by dignitaries passed unconditionally. The Japanese imperial examinations gradually died out afterwards. The examinations were revived in 1787 during the
Edo period. The new examinations, called
sodoku kugin, were more or less the same as the Chinese ones in terms of content (
Confucianism and
Neo-Confucianism), but did not confer official titles, only honorary titles. During the early
Meiji era,
Kanda Takahira wrote a letter advocating for the establishment of a Japanese recruitment system with the Chinese imperial examination system as a model. The proposal failed to gain support.
Korea reenactment, 2018
Korea directly participated in the Chinese imperial examination system during the 9th century when as many as 88
Sillans received degrees after passing the
Tang examinations. The Korean
examination system was established in 958 under the reign of
Gwangjong of Goryeo. The examination system was spread to
Goryeo in 957 by a visiting
Hanlin scholar named Shuang Ji from
Later Zhou. Gwangjong was highly pleased with Shuang Ji and requested that he remain at the Korean court permanently. According to Xu Jing, writing during the
Song dynasty, the Korean examinations were largely the same as the Chinese ones with some differences. Unlike in China, the examination papers were written in both the
Idu script and
Classical Chinese. The exam takers did not sit in separate cells like in China, but rather sat on the ground in the open under sunshades. Some Korean examination practices converged with the Chinese system. By the end of the Goryeo period, a military exam had been added, the triennial schedule observed, and the exam hierarchy organized into provincial, metropolitan, and palace levels, similar to the Chinese. Other practices, such as the inclusion of exams on
Buddhism and the worship of
Confucius, were not shared with China. Outside China, the examination system was most widely implemented in Korea, with enrollment rates surpassing even that of China. In theory, any free man (not
Nobi) was able to take the examinations, but in practice the
yangban aristocratic class eventually monopolized the system. At the start of the
Joseon period, 33 candidates were selected from every triennial examination, and the number increased to 50 later on. In comparison, China's selected candidates after each palace examination were no more than 40 to 300 from the Tang to Ming dynasties while encompassing a landmass six times larger than Korea. By the
Joseon period, high offices were closed to aristocrats who had not passed the exams. Over the span of 600 years, the Joseon civil service selected more than 14,606 candidates in the highest level examinations on 744 occasions. The examination system continued until 1894 when it was abolished by the
Gabo Reform.
Vietnam The Confucian examination system in Vietnam was established in 1075 under the
Lý dynasty Emperor
Lý Nhân Tông and lasted until the
Nguyễn dynasty Emperor
Khải Định (1919). During the Lý dynasty (1009–1225) the imperial examinations had very limited influence. Only four were held throughout the entire duration of the dynasty, producing a small handful of officials. Later during the
Trần dynasty (1225–1400),
Trần Thái Tông began to filter students through the Tiến sĩ (
jinshi) examinations. From 1232 to 1314, ten Tiến sĩ examinations were held. In 1314, 50 Tiến sĩ were recruited in one exam. The exams were open to native Vietnamese as well as immigrant Chinese. For the first few centuries after the examinations were instituted, a significant portion of degree holders were of Chinese descent. Examinees during the Lê dynasty were seated according to name order in bamboo cages. This switched to tents during the Nguyễn dynasty. Throughout most of the Vietnamese examinations' history, there were only three levels to the Vietnamese system: provincial, metropolitan, and court. A provincial examination was re-implemented by the
Nguyễn dynasty (1802–1945) in 1807 after stabilizing the state and a metropolitan examination in 1825. Emperor
Minh Mạng (r. 1820–1839) paid special attention to the examinations and even dined with newly recruited Tiến sĩ frequently. Although Confucian content took precedence in the examinations, material on
Buddhism and
Daoism were also included. In 1429,
Lê Thái Tổ ordered famous Buddhist and Daoist monks to take the exams, and if they failed, they had to forfeit their religious life. Elephants were used to guard the examination halls until 1840. During the 845 years of civil service examinations held in Vietnam, about 3,000 candidates passed the highest level exams and had their names carved on stelae in the
Temple of Literature in
Hanoi.
In the West The imperial examination system was known to
Europeans as early as 1570. It received great attention from the
Jesuit Matteo Ricci (1552–1610), who viewed it and its Confucian appeal to rationalism favorably in comparison to religious reliance on "apocalypse". Knowledge of Confucianism and the examination system was disseminated broadly in
Europe following the
Latin translation of Ricci's journal in 1614. During the 18th century, the imperial examinations were often discussed in conjunction with Confucianism, which attracted great attention from contemporary European thinkers such as
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,
Voltaire,
Montesquieu,
Baron d'Holbach,
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and
Friedrich Schiller. However those who admired China such as
Christian Wolff were sometimes persecuted. In 1721 he gave a lecture at the
University of Halle praising Confucianism, for which he was accused of atheism and forced to give up his position at the university. Justi, like other cameralists, also lauded many Chinese public policies including the examination system. The earliest evidence of examinations in Europe date to 1215 or 1219 in
Bologna. These were chiefly oral in the form of a question or answer, disputation, determination, defense, or public lecture. The candidate gave a public lecture of two prepared passages assigned to him from the civil or canon law, and then doctors asked him questions, or expressed objections to answers. Evidence of written examinations do not appear until 1702 at
Trinity College, Cambridge. According to
Sir Michael Sadler, Europe may have had written examinations since 1518 but the "evidence is not very clear". In
Prussia, medication examinations began in 1725. The
Mathematical Tripos, founded in 1747, is commonly believed to be the first honor examination, but
James Bass Mullinger considered "the candidates not having really undergone any examination whatsoever" because the qualification for a degree was merely four years of residence. France adopted the examination system in 1791 as a result of the
French Revolution but it collapsed after only ten years.
Germany implemented the examination system around 1800. In 1840, France set an envoy to Germany to examine its examination system with a view of applying it in France. Competitive exams were set up respectively in 1872, 1879 and 1886 for the three administrative
Grands corps (
Conseil d'État,
Inspection des Finances and
Cour des Comptes) until the generalisation of an examination to enter the French Civil Service in 1941. Englishmen in the 18th century such as
Eustace Budgell recommended imitating the Chinese examination system.
Adam Smith recommended examinations to qualify for employment in 1776. In 1838, the
Congregational church missionary
Walter Henry Medhurst considered the Chinese exams to be "worthy of imitating". In 1806, the
British East India Company established
a Civil Service College near London for training of the company's administrators in India. This was based on the recommendations of East India Company officials serving in China and had seen the Imperial examinations. In 1829, the company introduced civil service examinations in India on a limited basis. This established the principle of qualification process for civil servants in England. In 1847 and 1856, Thomas Taylor Meadows strongly recommended the adoption of the Chinese principle of competitive examinations in
Great Britain. Both
Thomas Babington Macaulay, who was instrumental in passing the
Saint Helena Act 1833, and
Stafford Northcote, 1st Earl of Iddesleigh, who prepared the
Northcote–Trevelyan Report that catalyzed the
British civil service, were familiar with Chinese history and institutions. When the report was brought up in parliament in 1853, Lord Monteagle argued against the implementation of open examinations because it was a Chinese system and China was not an "enlightened country". Lord Stanley called the examinations the "Chinese Principle". The Earl of Granville did not deny this but argued in favor of the examination system, considering that the minority Manchus had been able to rule China with it for over 200 years. In 1854,
Edwin Chadwick reported that some noblemen did not agree with the measures introduced because they were Chinese. The examination system was finally implemented in the
British Indian Civil Service in 1855, prior to which admission into the civil service was purely a matter of patronage, and in
England in 1870. Even as late as ten years after the competitive examination plan was passed, people still attacked it as an "adopted Chinese culture".
Alexander Baillie-Cochrane, 1st Baron Lamington insisted that the English "did not know that it was necessary for them to take lessons from the Celestial Empire". In 1875,
Archibald Sayce voiced concern over the prevalence of competitive examinations, which he described as "the invasion of this new Chinese culture". After Great Britain's successful implementation of systematic, open, and competitive examinations in India in the 19th century, similar systems were instituted in the
United Kingdom itself, and in other Western nations. Like the British, the development of the French and American civil service was influenced by the Chinese system. When
Thomas Jenckes made a
Report from the Joint Select Committee on Retrenchment in 1868, it contained a chapter on the civil service in China. In 1870, William Spear wrote a book called
The Oldest and the Newest Empire: China and the United States, in which he urged the United States government to adopt the Chinese examination system. Like in Britain, many of the American elites scorned the plan to implement competitive examinations, which they considered foreign, Chinese, and "un-American". As a result, the civil services reform introduced into the
House of Representatives in 1868 was not passed until 1883. The Civil Service Commission tried to combat such sentiments in its report: ==Examinations in modern China==