Capitoline Triad The Capitoline Triad was introduced to Rome by the Tarquins. Dumézil thinks it might have been an Etruscan (or local) creation based on Vitruvius' treatise on architecture, in which the three deities are associated as the most important. It is possible that the Etruscans paid particular attention to
Menrva (Minerva) as a goddess of destiny, in addition to the royal couple Uni (Juno) and Tinia (Jupiter). In Rome, Minerva later assumed a military aspect under the influence of
Athena Pallas (Polias). Dumézil argues that with the advent of the Republic, Jupiter became the only king of Rome, no longer merely the first of the great gods.
Archaic Triad The Archaic Triad is a hypothetical theological structure (or system) consisting of the gods Jupiter, Mars and Quirinus. It was first described by Wissowa, and the concept was developed further by Dumézil. The three-function hypothesis of
Indo-European society advanced by Dumézil holds that in prehistory, society was divided into three classes: At least for the three main functions, people in each station in life had their religious counterparts the divine figures of the sovereign god, the warrior god, and the industrius god; there were almost always two separate gods for class 1, and sometimes more than one for class 3. Over time gods or, groups of gods might be consolidated or split, and it is unclear that there were ever any strict separations of all function. The sovereign function (1) embodied in Jupiter entailed omnipotence; thence, a domain extended over every aspect of nature and life. The three functions are interrelated with one another, overlapping to some extent; the sovereign function, although including a part that is essentially religious in nature, is involved in many ways in areas pertaining to the other two. Therefore, Jupiter is the "magic player" in the founding of the Roman state and the fields of war, agricultural plenty, human fertility, and wealth. This hypothesis has not found widespread support among scholars.
Jupiter and Minerva Apart from being protectress of the arts and craft as Minerva Capta, who was brought from Falerii, Minerva's association to Jupiter and relevance to Roman state religion is mainly linked to the
Palladium, a wooden statue of Athena that could move the eyes and wave the spear. It was stored in the
penus interior, inner penus of the
aedes Vestae, temple of Vesta and considered the most important among the
pignora imperii, pawns of dominion, empire. In Roman traditional lore it was brought from Troy by Aeneas. Scholars though think it was last taken to Rome in the third or second century BC.
Juno and Fortuna The divine couple received from Greece its matrimonial implications, thence bestowing on
Juno the role of tutelary goddess of marriage (
Iuno Pronuba). The couple itself though cannot be reduced to a Greek apport. The association of Juno and Jupiter is of the most ancient Latin theology.
Praeneste offers a glimpse into original Latin mythology: the local goddess
Fortuna is represented as milking two infants, one male and one female, namely Jove (Jupiter) and Juno. It seems fairly safe to assume that from the earliest times they were identified by their own proper names and since they got them they were never changed through the course of history: they were called Jupiter and Juno. These gods were the most ancient deities of every Latin town. Praeneste preserved divine filiation and infancy as the sovereign god and his paredra Juno have a mother who is the primordial goddess Fortuna Primigenia. Many terracotta statuettes have been discovered which represent a woman with a child: one of them represents exactly the scene described by Cicero of a woman with two children of different sex who touch her breast. Two of the votive inscriptions to Fortuna associate her and Jupiter: " Fortunae Iovi puero..." and "Fortunae Iovis puero..." In 1882 though R. Mowat published an inscription in which Fortuna is called
daughter of Jupiter, raising new questions and opening new perspectives in the theology of Latin gods. Dumézil has elaborated an interpretative theory according to which this
aporia would be an intrinsic, fundamental feature of Indoeuropean deities of the primordial and sovereign level, as it finds a parallel in Vedic religion. The contradiction would put Fortuna both at the origin of time and into its ensuing diachronic process: it is the comparison offered by Vedic deity
Aditi, the
Not-Bound or
Enemy of Bondage, that shows that there is no question of choosing one of the two apparent options: as the mother of the
Aditya she has the same type of relationship with one of his sons,
Dakṣa, the minor sovereign. who represents the
Creative Energy, being at the same time his mother and daughter, as is true for the whole group of sovereign gods to which she belongs. Moreover, Aditi is thus one of the heirs (along with
Savitr) of the opening god of the Indoiranians, as she is represented with her head on her two sides, with the two faces looking opposite directions. The mother of the sovereign gods has thence two solidal but distinct modalities of duplicity, i.e. of having two foreheads and a double position in the genealogy. Angelo Brelich has interpreted this theology as the basic opposition between the primordial absence of order (chaos) and the organisation of the cosmos.
Janus The relation of Jupiter to Janus is problematic. Varro defines Jupiter as the god who has
potestas (power) over the forces by which anything happens in the world. Janus, however, has the privilege of being invoked first in rites, since in his power are the beginnings of things (
prima), the appearance of Jupiter included.
Saturn The
Latins considered Saturn the predecessor of Jupiter. Saturn reigned in
Latium during a mythical
Golden Age reenacted every year at the festival of
Saturnalia. Saturn also retained primacy in matters of agriculture and money. Unlike the Greek tradition of
Cronus and Zeus, the usurpation of Saturn as king of the gods by Jupiter was not viewed by the Latins as violent or hostile; Saturn continued to be revered in his temple at the foot of the Capitol Hill, which maintained the alternative name
Saturnius into the time of Varro. A. Pasqualini has argued that Saturn was related to
Iuppiter Latiaris, the old Jupiter of the Latins, as the original figure of this Jupiter was superseded on the Alban Mount, whereas it preserved its gruesome character in the ceremony held at the sanctuary of the Latiar Hill in Rome which involved a human sacrifice and the aspersion of the statue of the god with the blood of the victim.
Fides The abstract
personification Fides ("Faith, Trust") was one of the oldest gods associated with Jupiter. As guarantor of public faith, Fides had her temple on the Capitol (near that of Capitoline Jupiter).
Dius Fidius Dius Fidius is considered a
theonym for Jupiter, and sometimes a separate entity also known in Rome as
Semo Sancus Dius Fidius. Wissowa argued that while Jupiter is the god of the
Fides Publica Populi Romani as
Iuppiter Lapis (by whom important oaths are sworn), Dius Fidius is a deity established for everyday use and was charged with the protection of good faith in private affairs. Dius Fidius would thus correspond to
Zeus Pistios. The association with Jupiter may be a matter of divine relation; some scholars see him as a form of Hercules. Both Jupiter and Dius Fidius were wardens of oaths and wielders of lightning bolts; both required an opening in the roof of their temples. The functionality of Sancus occurs consistently within the sphere of
fides, oaths and respect for contracts and of the divine-sanction guarantee against their breach. Wissowa suggested that Semo Sancus is the
genius of Jupiter, but the concept of a deity's
genius is a development of the Imperial period. Some aspects of the oath-ritual for Dius Fidius (such as proceedings under the open sky or in the
compluvium of private residences), and the fact the temple of Sancus had no roof, suggest that the oath sworn by Dius Fidius predated that for
Iuppiter Lapis or
Iuppiter Feretrius.
Genius Augustine quotes Varro who explains the
genius as "the god who is in charge and has the power to generate everything" and "the rational spirit of all (therefore, everyone has their own)". Augustine concludes that Jupiter should be considered the
genius of the universe. G. Wissowa advanced the hypothesis that Semo
Sancus is the genius of Jupiter. probably referring to the
Lar Familiaris.
Mutunus Tutunus had his shrine at the foot of the Velian Hill near those of the Di Penates and of Vica Pota, who were among the most ancient gods of the Roman community, according to Wissowa. Dumézil opines that the attribution of a Genius to the gods should be earlier than its first attestation of 58 BC, in an inscription which mentions the
Iovis Genius. A connection between Genius and Jupiter seems apparent in
Plautus' comedy
Amphitryon, in which Jupiter takes up the appearance of
Alcmena's husband in order to seduce her: J. Hubeaux sees there a reflection of the story that
Scipio Africanus' mother conceived him with a snake that was in fact Jupiter transformed. Scipio himself claimed that only he would rise to the mansion of the gods through the widest gate. Among the Etruscan
Penates there is a
Genius Iovialis who comes after
Fortuna and
Ceres and before
Pales. Genius Iovialis is one of the
Penates of the humans and not of Jupiter though, as these were located in region I of Martianus Capella's division of Heaven, while Genius appears in regions V and VI along with Ceres, Favor (possibly a Roman approximation to an Etruscan male manifestation of Fortuna) and Pales. This is in accord with the definition of the Penates of man being Fortuna, Ceres, Pales and Genius Iovialis and the statement in Macrobius that the Larentalia were dedicated to Jupiter as the god whence the souls of men come from and to whom they return after death.
Summanus The god of nighttime lightning has been interpreted as an aspect of Jupiter, either a
chthonic manifestation of the god or a separate god of the underworld. A statue of Summanus stood on the roof of the Temple of Capitoline Jupiter, and
Iuppiter Summanus is one of the epithets of Jupiter. Dumézil sees the opposition Dius Fidius versus Summanus as complementary, interpreting it as typical to the inherent ambiguity of the sovereign god exemplified by that of Mitra and Varuna in Vedic religion. The complementarity of the epithets is shown in inscriptions found on
puteals or
bidentals reciting either
fulgur Dium conditum or
fulgur Summanum conditum in places struck by daytime versus nighttime lightning bolts respectively. This is also consistent with the etymology of
Summanus, deriving from
sub and
mane (the time before morning).
Liber Iuppiter was associated with
Liber through his epithet of
Liber (association not yet been fully explained by scholars, due to the scarcity of early documentation). In the past, it was maintained that Liber was only a progressively-detached
hypostasis of Jupiter; consequently, the vintage festivals were to be attributed only to
Iuppiter Liber. Such a hypothesis was rejected as groundless by Wissowa, although he was a supporter of Liber's Jovian origin. Olivier de Cazanove contends that it is difficult to admit that Liber (who is present in the oldest calendars—those of Numa—in the
Liberalia and in the month of
Liber at Lavinium) was derived from another deity. Such a derivation would find support only in epigraphic documents, primarily from the Osco-Sabellic area. Wissowa sets the position of
Iuppiter Liber within the framework of an agrarian Jupiter. The god also had a temple in this name on the Aventine in Rome, which was restored by Augustus and dedicated on 1 September. Here, the god was sometimes named
Liber and sometimes
Libertas. Wissowa opines that the relationship existed in the concept of creative abundance through which the supposedly-separate Liber might have been connected to the Greek god
Dionysos, although both deities might not have been originally related to
viticulture. Other scholars assert that there was no Liber (other than a god of wine) within historical memory. Olivier de Cazanove argues that the domain of the sovereign god Jupiter was that of sacred, sacrificial wine (
vinum inferium), while that of Liber and Libera was confined to secular wine (
vinum spurcum); these two types were obtained through differing fermentation processes. The offer of wine to Liber was made possible by naming the
mustum (grape juice) stored in
amphoras
sacrima. Sacred wine was obtained by the natural fermentation of juice of grapes free from flaws of any type, religious (e. g. those struck by lightning, brought into contact with corpses or wounded people or coming from an unfertilised grapeyard) or secular (by "cutting" it with old wine). Secular (or "profane") wine was obtained through several types of manipulation (e.g. by adding honey, or
mulsum; using raisins, or
passum; by boiling, or
defrutum). However, the
sacrima used for the offering to the two gods for the preservation of grapeyards, vessels and wine was obtained only by pouring the juice into amphors after pressing. The
mustum was considered
spurcum (dirty), and thus unusable in sacrifices. The amphor (itself not an item of sacrifice) permitted presentation of its content on a table or could be added to a sacrifice; this happened at the
auspicatio vindamiae for the first grape and for ears of corn of the
praemetium on a dish (
lanx) at the temple of
Ceres. Dumézil, on the other hand, sees the relationship between Jupiter and Liber as grounded in the social and political relevance of the two gods (who were both considered patrons of freedom). The
Liberalia of March were, since earliest times, the occasion for the ceremony of the donning of the
toga virilis or
libera (which marked the passage into adult citizenship by young people). Augustine relates that these festivals had a particularly obscene character: a
phallus was taken to the fields on a cart, and then back in triumph to town. In
Lavinium they lasted a month, during which the population enjoyed bawdy jokes. The most honest
matronae were supposed to publicly crown the
phallus with flowers, to ensure a good harvest and repeal the
fascinatio (evil eye). This complex of rites and beliefs shows that the divine couple's jurisdiction extended over fertility in general, not only that of grapes. The etymology of
Liber (archaic form
Loifer, Loifir) was explained by Émile Benveniste as formed on the IE theme *leudh- plus the suffix -es-; its original meaning is "the one of germination, he who ensures the sprouting of crops". The relationship of Jupiter with freedom was a common belief among the Roman people, as demonstrated by the dedication of the
Mons Sacer to the god after the first secession of the
plebs. Later inscriptions also show the unabated popular belief in Jupiter as bestower of freedom in the imperial era.
Veiove Scholars have been often puzzled by Ve(d)iove (or
Veiovis, or Vedius) and unwilling to discuss his identity, claiming our knowledge of this god is insufficient. Most, however, agree that Veiove is a sort of special Jupiter or anti-Iove, or even an underworld Jupiter. In other words, Veiove is indeed the Capitoline god himself, who takes up a different, diminished appearance (
iuvenis and
parvus, young and gracile), in order to be able to discharge sovereign functions over places, times and spheres that by their own nature are excluded from the direct control of Jupiter as Optimus Maximus. This conclusion is based on information provided by Gellius, who states his name is formed by adding prefix
ve (here denoting "deprivation" or "negation") to
Iove (whose name Gellius posits as rooted in the verb
iuvo "I benefit"). D. Sabbatucci has stressed the feature of bearer of instability and antithesis to cosmic order of the god, who threatens the kingly power of Jupiter as
Stator and
Centumpeda and whose presence occurs side by side to Janus' on 1 January, but also his function of helper to the growth of the young Jupiter. In 1858
Ludwig Preller suggested that Veiovis may be the sinister double of Jupiter. The god (under the name
Vetis) is placed in the last case (number 16) of the outer rim of the Piacenza Liver—before
Cilens (Nocturnus), who ends (or begins in the Etruscan vision) the disposition of the gods. In
Martianus Capella's division of heaven, he is found in region XV with the
dii publici; as such, he numbers among the infernal (or antipodal) gods. The location of his two temples in Rome—near those of Jupiter (one on the Capitoline Hill, in the low between the
arx and the Capitolium, between the two groves where the
asylum founded by Romulus stood, the other on the Tiber Island near that of
Iuppiter Iurarius, later also known as temple of Aesculapius)—may be significant in this respect, along with the fact that he is considered the father of Apollo, perhaps because he was depicted carrying arrows. He is also considered to be the unbearded Jupiter. The dates of his festivals support the same conclusion: they fall on 1 January, 7 March and 21 May, the first date being the recurrence of the
Agonalia, dedicated to Janus and celebrated by the king with the sacrifice of a ram. The nature of the sacrifice is debated; Gellius states
capra, a female goat, although some scholars posit a ram. This sacrifice occurred
rito humano, which may mean "with the rite appropriate for human sacrifice". Gellius concludes by stating that this god is one of those who receive sacrifices so as to persuade them to refrain from causing harm. The arrow is an ambivalent symbol; it was used in the ritual of the
devotio (the general who vowed had to stand on an arrow). It is perhaps because of the arrow and of the juvenile looks that Gellius identifies Veiove with Apollo and as a god who must receive worship in order to obtain his abstention from harming men, along with
Robigus and
Averruncus. The ambivalence in the identity of Veiove is apparent in the fact that while he is present in places and times which may have a negative connotation (such as the
asylum of Romulus in between the two groves on the Capitol, the Tiberine island along with Faunus and Aesculapius, the kalends of January, the nones of March, and 21 May, a statue of his nonetheless stands in the
arx. Moreover, the initial particle
ve- which the ancient supposed were part of his name is itself ambivalent as it may have both an accrescitive and diminutive value. Maurice Besnier has remarked that a temple to
Iuppiter was dedicated by
praetor Lucius Furius Purpureo before the
battle of Cremona against the
Celtic Cenomani of Cisalpine Gaul. An inscription found at
Brescia in 1888 shows that
Iuppiter Iurarius was worshipped there and one found on the south tip of Tiber Island in 1854 that there was a cult to the god on the spot too. Besnier speculates that Lucius Furius had evoked the chief god of the enemy and built a temple to him in Rome outside the
pomerium. On 1 January, the
Fasti Praenestini record the festivals of Aesculapius and Vediove on the Island, while in the
Fasti Ovid speaks of
Jupiter and his grandson. Livy records that in 192 BC,
duumvir Q. Marcus Ralla dedicated to Jupiter on the Capitol the two temples promised by L. Furius Purpureo, one of which was that promised during the war against the Gauls. Besnier would accept a correction to Livy's passage (proposed by Jordan) to read
aedes Veiovi instead of
aedes duae Iovi. Such a correction concerns the temples dedicated on the Capitol: it does not address the question of the dedication of the temple on the Island, which is puzzling, since the place is attested epigraphically as dedicated to the cult of
Iuppiter Iurarius, in the
Fasti Praenestini of
Vediove and to Jupiter according to Ovid. The two gods may have been seen as equivalent:
Iuppiter Iurarius is an awesome and vengeful god, parallel to the Greek
Zeus Orkios, the avenger of perjury. A. Pasqualini has argued that Veiovis seems related to
Iuppiter Latiaris, as the original figure of this Jupiter would have been superseded on the Alban Mount, whereas it preserved its gruesome character in the ceremony held on the sanctuary of the Latiar Hill, the southernmost hilltop of the
Quirinal in Rome, which involved a human sacrifice. The
gens Iulia had gentilician cults at
Bovillae where a dedicatory inscription to Vediove has been found in 1826 on an ara. According to Pasqualini it was a deity similar to Vediove, wielder of lightning bolts and chthonic, who was connected to the cult of the founders who first inhabited the Alban Mount and built the sanctuary. Such a cult once superseded on the Mount would have been taken up and preserved by the Iulii, private citizens bound to the
sacra Albana by their Alban origin.
Victoria head of Jupiter (
obverse) and (reverse) Victory, standing ("
ROMA" below in
relief)|alt=Roman coin, with bearded head on front and standing figure on reverse Victoria was connected to
Iuppiter Victor in his role as bestower of military victory. Jupiter, as a sovereign god, was considered as having the power to conquer anyone and anything in a supernatural way; his contribution to military victory was different from that of
Mars (god of military valour). Victoria appears first on the reverse of coins representing Venus (driving the quadriga of Jupiter, with her head crowned and with a palm in her hand) during the first Punic War. Sometimes, she is represented walking and carrying a trophy. A temple was dedicated to the goddess afterwards on the Palatine, testifying to her high station in the Roman mind. When
Hieron of Syracuse presented a golden statuette of the goddess to Rome, the Senate had it placed in the temple of Capitoline Jupiter among the greatest (and most sacred) deities. Although Victoria played a significant role in the religious ideology of the late Republic and the Empire, she is undocumented in earlier times. A function similar to hers may have been played by the little-known
Vica Pota.
Terminus Juventas and Terminus were the gods who, according to legend, refused to leave their sites on the Capitol when the construction of the temple of Jupiter was undertaken. Therefore, they had to be reserved a
sacellum within the new temple. Their stubbornness was considered a good omen; it would guarantee youth, stability and safety to Rome on its site. This legend is generally thought by scholars to indicate their strict connection with Jupiter. An inscription found near
Ravenna reads
Iuppiter Ter., indicating that Terminus is an aspect of Jupiter. Terminus is the god of boundaries (public and private), as he is portrayed in literature. The religious value of the
boundary marker is documented by Plutarch, who ascribes to king Numa the construction of temples to Fides and Terminus and the delimitation of Roman territory. Ovid gives a vivid description of the rural rite at a boundary of fields of neighbouring peasants on 23 February (the day of the
Terminalia. On that day, Roman pontiffs and magistrates held a ceremony at the sixth mile of the
Via Laurentina (ancient border of the Roman
ager, which maintained a religious value). This festival, however, marked the end of the year and was linked to time more directly than to space (as attested by Augustine's
apologia on the role of Janus with respect to endings). Dario Sabbatucci has emphasised the temporal affiliation of Terminus, a reminder of which is found in the rite of the
regifugium. Dumézil, on the other hand, views the function of this god as associated with the legalistic aspect of the sovereign function of Jupiter. Terminus would be the counterpart of the minor Vedic god Bagha, who oversees the just and fair division of goods among citizens.
Iuventas Along with
Terminus,
Iuventas (also known as
Iuventus and
Iuunta) represents an aspect of Jupiter (as the legend of her refusal to leave the Capitol Hill demonstrates. Her name has the same root as
Juno (from
Iuu-, "young, youngster"); the ceremonial litter bearing the sacred goose of Juno Moneta stopped before her
sacellum on the festival of the goddess. Later, she was identified with the Greek
Hebe. The fact that Jupiter is related to the concept of youth is shown by his epithets
Puer,
Iuuentus and
Ioviste (interpreted as "the youngest" by some scholars). Dumézil noted the presence of the two minor sovereign deities Bagha and
Aryaman beside the Vedic sovereign gods Varuna and Mitra (though more closely associated with Mitra); the couple would be reflected in Rome by
Terminus and
Iuventas. Aryaman is the god of young soldiers. The function of
Iuventas is to protect the
iuvenes (the
novi togati of the year, who are required to offer a sacrifice to Jupiter on the Capitol) and the Roman soldiers (a function later attributed to Juno). King Servius Tullius, in reforming the Roman social organisation, required that every adolescent offer a coin to the goddess of youth upon entering adulthood. In Dumézil's analysis, the function of
Iuventas (the personification of youth), was to control the entrance of young men into society and protect them until they reach the age of
iuvenes or
iuniores (i.e. of serving the state as soldiers). A temple to
Iuventas was promised in 207 BC by consul
Marcus Livius Salinator and dedicated in 191 BC.
Penates The Romans considered the Penates as the gods to whom they owed their own existence. As noted by Wissowa
Penates is an adjective, meaning "those of or from the
penus" the innermost part, most hidden recess; Dumézil though refuses Wissowa's interpretation of
penus as the storeroom of a household. As a nation the Romans honoured the
Penates publici: Dionysius calls them
Trojan gods as they were absorbed into the Trojan legend. They had a temple in Rome at the foot of the
Velian Hill, near the Palatine, in which they were represented as a couple of male youth. They were honoured every year by the new consuls before entering office at
Lavinium, because the Romans believed the Penates of that town were identical to their own. The concept of
di Penates is more defined in Etruria:
Arnobius (citing a Caesius) states that the Etruscan Penates were named Fortuna, Ceres, Genius Iovialis and Pales; according to
Nigidius Figulus, they included those of Jupiter, of Neptune, of the infernal gods and of mortal men. According to Varro the Penates reside in the recesses of Heaven and are called
Consentes and
Complices by the Etruscans because they rise and set together, are twelve in number and their names are unknown, six male and six females and are the cousellors and masters of Jupiter. Martianus states they are always in agreement among themselves. While these last gods seem to be the Penates of Jupiter, Jupiter himself along with Juno and Minerva is one of the Penates of man according to some authors. This complex concept is reflected in Martianus Capella's division of heaven, found in Book I of his
De Nuptiis Mercurii et Philologiae, which places the
Di Consentes Penates in region I with the
Favores Opertanei;
Ceres and
Genius in region V;
Pales in region VI;
Favor and
Genius (again) in region VII;
Secundanus Pales,
Fortuna and
Favor Pastor in region XI. The disposition of these divine entities and their repetition in different locations may be due to the fact that
Penates belonging to different categories (of Jupiter in region I, earthly or of mortal men in region V) are intended.
Favor(es) may be the
Etruscan masculine equivalent of
Fortuna. == See also ==