Zaporozhian Cossacks , 1884 The Zaporozhian Cossacks lived on the
Pontic–Caspian steppe below the
Dnieper Rapids (Ukrainian:
za porohamy), also known as the
Wild Fields. The group became well known, and its numbers increased greatly between the 15th and 17th centuries. The Zaporozhian Cossacks played an important role in European
geopolitics, participating in a series of conflicts and alliances with the
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth,
Russia, and the
Ottoman Empire. The Zaporozhians gained a reputation for their raids against the Ottoman Empire and its
vassals, although they also sometimes plundered other neighbors. Their actions increased tension along the southern border of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Low-level warfare took place in those territories for most of the period of the Commonwealth (1569–1795).
Emergence Prior to the formation of the Zaporozhian
Sich, Cossacks had usually been organized by
Ruthenian boyars, or princes of the nobility, especially various
Lithuanian starostas. Merchants, peasants, and runaways from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth,
Muscovy, and Moldavia also joined the Cossacks. The first recorded
sich prototype was formed by the starosta of
Cherkasy and
Kaniv,
Dmytro Vyshnevetsky, who built a fortress on the island of Little
Khortytsia on the banks of the Lower
Dnieper in 1552. The Zaporozhian Host adopted a lifestyle that combined the ancient Cossack order and habits with those of the
Knights Hospitaller. The Cossack structure arose, in part, in response to the struggle against Tatar raids. Socio-economic developments in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth were another important factor in the growth of the Ukrainian Cossacks. During the 16th century, serfdom was imposed because of the favorable conditions for grain sales in Western Europe. This subsequently decreased the locals' land allotments and freedom of movement. In addition, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth government attempted to impose Catholicism, and to
Polonize the local Ukrainian population. The basic form of resistance and opposition by the locals and burghers was flight and settlement in the sparsely populated steppe.
Relations with surrounding states The major powers tried to exploit Cossack military power for their own purposes. In the 16th century, with the area of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth extending south, the
Zaporozhian Cossacks were mostly, if tentatively, regarded by the Commonwealth as their subjects. Foreign and internal pressure on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth led to the government making concessions to the Zaporozhian Cossacks. King
Stephen Báthory granted them certain rights and freedoms in 1578, and they gradually began to create their foreign policy. They did so independently of the government, and often against its interests, as for example with their role in Moldavian affairs, and with the signing of a treaty with
Emperor Rudolf II in the 1590s. In 1637, the Zaporozhian Cossacks, joined by the
Don Cossacks, captured the strategic Ottoman fortress of
Azov, which guarded the Don. The Zaporizhian Cossacks became particularly strong in the first quarter of the 17th century under the leadership of hetman
Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny, who launched successful campaigns against the Tatars and Turks. Tsar
Boris Godunov had incurred the hatred of Ukrainian Cossacks by ordering the Don Cossacks to drive away from the Don all the Ukrainian Cossacks fleeing the failed uprisings of the 1590s. This contributed to the Ukrainian Cossacks' willingness to fight against him. In 1604, 2,000 Zaporizhian Cossacks fought on the side of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and their proposal for the Tsar (
Dmitri I), against the Muscovite army. By September 1604, Dmitri I had gathered a force of 2,500 men, of whom 1,400 were Cossacks. Two thirds of these "cossacks", however, were in fact Ukrainian civilians, only 500 being professional Ukrainian Cossacks. On July 4, 1610, 4,000 Ukrainian Cossacks fought in the
Battle of Klushino, on the side of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. They helped to defeat a combined Muscovite-Swedish army and facilitate the occupation of Moscow from 1610 to 1611, riding into Moscow with
Stanisław Żółkiewski. The final attempt by
King Sigismund and
Wladyslav to seize the throne of Muscovy was launched on April 6, 1617. Although Wladyslav was the nominal leader, it was
Jan Karol Chodkiewicz who commanded the Commonwealth forces. By October, the towns of
Dorogobuzh and
Vyazma had surrendered. But a defeat, when the counterattack on Moscow by Chodkiewicz failed between Vyasma and
Mozhaysk, prompted the Polish-Lithuanian army to retreat. In 1618, Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny continued his campaign against the Tsardom of Russia on behalf of the Cossacks and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Numerous Russian towns were sacked, including
Livny and
Yelets. In September 1618, with Chodkiewicz, Konashevych-Sahaidachny laid siege to Moscow, but peace was secured. Consecutive treaties between the Ottoman Empire and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth called for the governments to keep the Cossacks and Tatars in check, but neither enforced the treaties strongly. The Polish forced the Cossacks to burn their boats and stop raiding by sea, but the activity did not cease entirely. During this time, the
Habsburg monarchy sometimes covertly hired Cossack raiders against the Ottomans, to ease pressure on their own borders. Many Cossacks and Tatars developed longstanding enmity due to the losses of their raids. The ensuing chaos and cycles of retaliation often turned the entire southeastern Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth border into a low-intensity war zone. It catalyzed escalation of Commonwealth–Ottoman warfare, from the
Moldavian Magnate Wars (1593–1617) to the
Battle of Cecora (1620), and campaigns in the
Polish–Ottoman War of 1633–1634.
Conflict with Poland Cossack numbers increased when the warriors were joined by
peasants escaping
serfdom in Russia and dependence in the Commonwealth. Attempts by the
szlachta to turn the Zaporozhian Cossacks into peasants eroded the formerly strong Cossack loyalty towards the Commonwealth. The government constantly rebuffed Cossack ambitions for recognition as equal to the
szlachta. Plans for transforming the Polish–Lithuanian two-nation Commonwealth into a
Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth made little progress, due to the unpopularity among the Ruthenian
szlachta of the idea of Ruthenian Cossacks being equal to them and their elite becoming members of the
szlachta. The Cossacks' strong historic allegiance to the
Eastern Orthodox Church also put them at odds with officials of the
Roman Catholic-dominated Commonwealth. Tensions increased when Commonwealth policies turned from relative tolerance to suppression of the Eastern Orthodox Church after the
Union of Brest. The Cossacks became strongly anti-Roman Catholic, an attitude that became synonymous with anti-Polish. After the Ottoman-Polish and Polish-Muscovite warfare ceased, the official Cossack register was again reduced. The registered Cossacks (
reiestrovi kozaky) were isolated from those who were excluded from the register, and from the Zaporizhian Host. This, together with intensified socioeconomic and national-religious oppression of the other classes in Ukrainian society, led to many Cossack uprisings in the 1630s. The nobility, which had obtained legal ownership of vast expanses of land on the Dnipro from the Polish kings, attempted to impose feudal dependency on the local population. Landowners utilized the locals in war, by raising the Cossack registry in times of hostility, and then radically decreasing it and forcing the Cossacks back into serfdom in times of peace. This institutionalized method of control bred discontent among the Cossacks. By the end of the 16th century, they began to revolt, in the uprisings of
Kryshtof Kosynsky (1591–1593),
Severyn Nalyvaiko (1594–1596),
Hryhorii Loboda (1596),
Marko Zhmailo (1625),
Taras Fedorovych (1630),
Ivan Sulyma (1635),
Pavlo Pavliuk and Dmytro Hunia (1637), and
Yakiv Ostrianyn and Karpo Skydan (1638). All were brutally suppressed and ended by the Polish government.
Cossack rebellions eventually culminated in the
Khmelnytsky Uprising, led by the hetman of the Zaporizhian Sich,
Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
Under Russian rule The Zaporozhian Sich had its own authorities, its own
"Lower" Zaporozhian Host, and its own land. In 1775, the Lower Dnieper Zaporozhian Host was destroyed. Later, its high-ranking Cossack leaders were exiled to Siberia, its last chief,
Petro Kalnyshevsky, becoming a prisoner of the
Solovetsky Islands. Some Cossacks moved to the
Danube Delta region, where they established
a new sich under Ottoman rule. To prevent further defection of Cossacks, the Russian government restored the special Cossack status of the majority of Zaporozhian Cossacks. This allowed them to unite in the Host of Loyal Zaporozhians, and later to reorganize into other hosts, of which the
Black Sea Host was most important. Because of land scarcity resulting from the distribution of Zaporozhian Sich lands among landlords, they eventually moved on to the
Kuban region. The majority of Danubian Sich Cossacks moved first to the Azov region in 1828, and later joined other former Zaporozhian Cossacks in the Kuban region. Groups were generally identified by faith rather than language in that period, and most descendants of Zaporozhian Cossacks in the Kuban region are bilingual, speaking both Russian and
Balachka, the local Kuban dialect of central
Ukrainian. Their folklore is largely Ukrainian. The predominant view of ethnologists and historians is that its origins lie in the common culture dating back to the Black Sea Cossacks.
Cossack Hetmanate Formation of the Cossack class in the Hetmanate 's entry to Kyiv'' by
Mykola Ivasyuk, end of the 19th century The waning loyalty of the Cossacks, and the ''
szlachta's'' arrogance towards them, resulted in several Cossack uprisings against the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in the early 17th century. Finally, the King's adamant refusal to accede to the demand to expand the
Cossack Registry prompted the largest and most successful of these: the
Khmelnytsky Uprising, that began in 1648. Some Cossacks, including the Polish
szlachta in Ukraine, converted to Eastern Orthodoxy, divided the lands of the Ruthenian
szlachta, and became the
Cossack szlachta. The uprising was one of a series of catastrophic events for the Commonwealth, known as
The Deluge, which greatly weakened the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and set the stage for its disintegration 100 years later. Influential relatives of the Ruthenian and Lithuanian
szlachta in Moscow helped to create the Russian–Polish alliance against Khmelnitsky's Cossacks, portrayed as rebels against order and against the private property of the Ruthenian Orthodox
szlachta. Don Cossacks' raids on
Crimea left Khmelnitsky without the aid of his usual Tatar allies. From the Russian perspective, the rebellion ended with the 1654
Treaty of Pereyaslav, in which, in order to overcome the Russian–Polish alliance against them, the Khmelnitsky Cossacks pledged their loyalty to the
Russian Tsar. In return, the Tsar guaranteed them his protection; recognized the Cossack
starshyna (nobility), their property, and their autonomy under his rule; and freed the Cossacks from the Polish sphere of influence and the land claims of the Ruthenian
szlachta. Only some of the Ruthenian
szlachta of the
Chernigov region, who had their origins in the Moscow state, saved their lands from division among Cossacks and became part of the Cossack
szlachta. After this, the Ruthenian
szlachta refrained from plans to have a Moscow Tsar as king of the Commonwealth, its own
Michał Korybut Wiśniowiecki later becoming king. The last, ultimately unsuccessful, attempt to rebuild the Polish–Cossack alliance and create a Polish–Lithuanian–Ruthenian Commonwealth was the 1658
Treaty of Hadiach. The treaty was approved by the Polish king and the
Sejm, and by some of the Cossack
starshyna, including
hetman Ivan Vyhovsky. The treaty failed, however, because the
starshyna were divided on the issue, and it had even less support among rank-and-file Cossacks.
Relations with neighbours As a result of the mid-17th century Khmelnytsky Uprising, the Zaporozhian Cossacks briefly established an independent state, which later became the autonomous
Cossack Hetmanate (1649–1764). It was placed under the
suzerainty of the Russian Tsar from 1667 but was ruled by local hetmans for a century. The principal political problem of the hetmans who followed the
Pereyeslav Agreement was defending the autonomy of the Hetmanate from Russian/Muscovite centralism. The hetmans
Ivan Vyhovsky,
Petro Doroshenko and
Ivan Mazepa attempted to resolve this by separating Ukraine from Russia. The Ukrainian hetman Ivan Vyhovsky, who succeeded Khmelnytsky in 1657, believed the Tsar was not living up to his responsibility. Accordingly, he concluded a treaty with representatives of the Polish king, who agreed to re-admit Cossack Ukraine by reforming the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to create a third constituent, comparable in status to that of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The
Union of Hadiach provoked a war between the Cossacks and the Muscovites/Russians that began in the fall of 1658. In response to Mazepa's alliance with
Charles XII of Sweden,
Peter I ordered the sacking of the then capital of the Hetmanate,
Baturyn. The city was burnt and looted, and 11,000 to 14,000 of its inhabitants were killed. The destruction of the Hetmanate's capital was a signal to Mazepa and the Hetmanate's inhabitants of severe punishment for disloyalty to the Tsar's authority. The Zaporizhian Sich at
Chortomlyk, which had existed since 1652, was also destroyed by Peter I's forces in 1709, in retribution for decision of its otaman
Kost Hordiyenko, to ally with Mazepa. Under Russian rule, the Cossack nation of the Zaporozhian Host was divided into two autonomous republics of the Russian Tsardom: the
Cossack Hetmanate, and the more independent
Zaporizhia. These organizations gradually lost their autonomy, and were abolished by
Catherine II in the late 18th century. The Hetmanate became the governorship of
Little Russia, and Zaporizhia was absorbed into
New Russia.
Black Sea, Azov and Danubian Sich Cossacks With the destruction of the Zaporizhian Sich, a number of Ukrainian-speaking Eastern Orthodox Zaporozhian Cossacks fled to the territory under the control of the
Ottoman Empire. Together with
Cossacks of Greater Russian origin, as well as the vast majority of
Old Believers and other people from "Greater Russia" (
Muscovy), they settled in the area of the
Danube river, and founded a new Sich. Many Ukrainian peasants and adventurers later joined the
Danubian Sich. While
Ukrainian folklore remembers the Danubian Sich, other new siches of Loyal Zaporozhians on the
Bug and Dniester rivers did not achieve such fame. Other Cossacks settled on the
Tisa river in the
Austrian Empire, also forming a new Sich. During the Cossack sojourn under Turkish rule, a new host was founded that numbered around 12,000 people by the end of 1778. Cossack settlement on the Russian border was approved by the Ottoman Empire after the Cossacks officially vowed to serve the
sultan. Yet internal conflict, and the political maneuvering of the Russian Empire led to splits among the Cossacks. Some of the runaway Cossacks returned to Russia, where the Russian army used them to form new military bodies that also incorporated Greeks, Albanians and Crimean Tatars. After the
Russo-Turkish war of 1787–1792, most of these Cossacks were absorbed into the
Black Sea Cossack Host together with Loyal Zaporozhians. Most of the remaining Cossacks who had stayed in the Danube Delta returned to Russia in 1828. They settled in the area north of the
Azov Sea, becoming known as the
Azov Cossacks. The majority of Zaporizhian Cossacks who had remained loyal to Russia despite the destruction of Sich became known as
Black Sea Cossacks. Both Azov and Black Sea Cossacks were resettled to colonize the
Kuban steppe, a crucial foothold for Russian expansion in the
Caucasus. In 1860, more Cossacks were resettled to the
North Caucasus, and merged into the
Kuban Cossack Host. == Russian Cossacks ==