Origins and characteristics The Germanic languages are traditionally divided into three groups: West,
East and
North Germanic. In some cases, their exact relation was difficult to determine from the sparse evidence of runic inscriptions, so that some individual varieties have been difficult to classify. This is especially true for the unattested
Jute language; today, most scholars classify
Jute as a West Germanic variety with several features of North Germanic. Until the late 20th century, some scholars claimed that all Germanic languages remained mutually intelligible throughout the
Migration Period, while others hold that speakers of West Germanic dialects like
Old Frankish and speakers of
Gothic were already unable to communicate fluently by around the 3rd century AD. As a result of the substantial progress in the study of Proto–West Germanic in the early 21st century, there is a growing consensus that East and West Germanic indeed would have been mutually unintelligible at that time, whereas West and North Germanic remained partially intelligible. Dialects with the features assigned to the western group formed from
Proto-Germanic in the late
Jastorf culture (). The West Germanic group is characterized by a number of
phonological,
morphological and
lexical innovations or
archaisms not found in North and East Germanic. Examples of West Germanic phonological particularities are: • The
delabialization of all
labiovelar consonants except word-initially. • Change of
*-zw- and
*- đw- to
*-ww- e.g.
*izwiz >
*iwwiz 'you' dat.pl.;
*feđwōr >
*fewwōr 'four'. • , the fricative
allophone of , becomes in all positions (The remaining fricative allophones and are retained). This must have occurred after
*-zw- and
*- đw- have become
*-ww-. • , the fricative allophone of , shifts to , but probably only in certain dialects, as the
High German consonant shift reflects a > change in
High German varieties that could only happen if was retained. • The fricative becomes , separate from the above allophonic fricatives. • Replacement of the second-person singular
preterite ending
-t with
-ī (
indicative and
subjunctive mood). For more than 150 years there has been a scientific debate on the best explanation of these difficult forms. Today, some linguists, beginning with J. V. Fierlinger in 1885 and followed by R. Löwe (1907), O. Behaghel (1922),
Jakob Sverdrup (1927),
Hermann Hirt (1932),
E. Polomé (1964), W. Meid (1971), E. Hill (2004), K.-H. Mottausch and W. Euler (1992ff.) explain this ending as a relic of the
Indo-European aorist tense. Under this assumption, the ending
-t would have replaced older
-ī(z). Sceptical about this explanation – and mostly explaining these forms as influenced by
optative forms – are
W. Scherer (1868),
W. L. van Helten (before 1917),
Edward Schröder (1921), Bammesberger (1986) and
Don Ringe (2014). • Loss of word-final . Only Old High German preserves it at all (as ) and only in single-syllable words. Following the later loss of word-final and , this made the nominative and accusative of many nouns identical. • Loss of final
*-a (including from PGmc.
*-an#) in polysyllables: e.g. acc. sg. OHG
horn vs. ORu.
horna 'horn'; this change must have occurred after the loss of word-final . •
West Germanic gemination: lengthening of all consonants except before .; this change must have occurred after the loss of final *-a. • Change of Proto-Germanic
*e to
i before
i and
j. A relative chronology of about 20 sound changes from Proto–Northwest Germanic to Proto–West Germanic (some of them only regional) was published by
Don Ringe in 2014. A phonological archaism of West Germanic is the preservation of
grammatischer Wechsel in most verbs, particularly in Old High German. This implies the same for West Germanic, whereas in East and North Germanic many of these alternations (in Gothic almost all of them) had been levelled out analogically by the time of the earliest texts. A common
morphological innovation of the West Germanic languages is the development of a
gerund. Common morphological archaisms of West Germanic include: • The preservation of an
instrumental case, • the preservation of the
athematic verbs (e.g.,
Anglo-Saxon dō(m),
Old Saxon dōm,
OHG. tōm "I do"), • the preservation of some traces of the
aorist (in Old English and Old High German, but neither in Gothic nor in
North Germanic). Furthermore, the West Germanic languages share many
lexemes not existing in North Germanic and/or East Germanic – archaisms as well as common
neologisms. Some
lexemes have specific meanings in West Germanic and there are specific innovations in word formation and derivational morphology, for example neologisms ending with modern English
-ship (< wgerm.
-*skapi, cf. German
-schaft) like
friendship (< wg.
*friund(a)skapi, cf. German
Freundschaft) are specific to the West Germanic languages and are thus seen as a Proto West Germanic innovation.
Validity of West Germanic as a subgroup Since at least the early 20th century, a number of morphological, phonological, and lexical archaisms and innovations have been identified as specifically West Germanic. Since then, individual Proto–West Germanic lexemes have also been reconstructed. Yet, there was a long dispute if these West Germanic characteristics had to be explained with the existence of a West Germanic proto-language or rather with
Sprachbund effects.
Hans Frede Nielsen's 1981 study
Old English and the Continental Germanic Languages made the conviction grow that a West Germanic proto-language did exist. But up until the 1990s, some scholars doubted that there was once a Proto–West Germanic
proto-language which was ancestral only to later West Germanic languages. In 2002, Gert Klingenschmitt presented a series of pioneering reconstructions of Proto–West Germanic morphological paradigmas and new views on some early West Germanic phonological changes, and in 2013 the first monographic analysis and description of Proto–West Germanic was published (second edition 2022). Today, there is a scientific consensus on what Don Ringe stated in 2012, that "these [phonological and morphological] changes amount to a massive evidence for a valid West Germanic clade". According to one proposal, after East Germanic broke off (an event usually dated to the 2nd or 1st century BC), the remaining Germanic languages, the
Northwest Germanic languages, divided into four main dialects: North Germanic, and the three groups conventionally called "West Germanic", namely: •
Northwest Germanic •
North Sea Germanic, ancestral to
Anglo-Frisian and
Old Saxon •
Weser–Rhine Germanic, ancestral to
Old Dutch and present as a
substrate or superstrate in some of the
Central Franconian and
Rhine Franconian dialects of
Old High German •
Elbe Germanic, ancestral to the
Upper German and most
Central German dialects of
Old High German, and the extinct
Langobardic language. Although there is quite a bit of knowledge about North Sea Germanic or Anglo-Frisian (because of the characteristic features of its daughter languages, Anglo-Saxon/
Old English and
Old Frisian), linguists know almost nothing about "Weser–Rhine Germanic" and "Elbe Germanic". In fact, both terms were coined in the 1940s to refer to groups of archaeological findings, rather than linguistic features. Only later were the terms applied to hypothetical dialectal differences within both regions. Even today, the very small number of
Migration Period runic inscriptions from the area, many of them illegible, unclear or consisting only of one word, often a name, is insufficient to identify linguistic features specific to the two supposed dialect groups. Evidence that East Germanic split off before the split between North and West Germanic comes from a number of linguistic innovations common to North and West Germanic, including: • The lowering of Proto-Germanic
ē (, also written
ǣ) to
ā. • The development of
umlaut. • The
rhotacism of to . • The development of the
demonstrative pronoun ancestral to English
this. Under that view, the properties that the West Germanic languages have in common, separate from the North Germanic languages, are not necessarily inherited from a "Proto–West Germanic" language, but may have spread by
language contact among the Germanic languages spoken in Central Europe, not reaching those spoken in Scandinavia or reaching them much later. Rhotacism, for example, was largely complete in West Germanic while North Germanic runic inscriptions still clearly distinguished the two phonemes. There is also evidence that the lowering of
ē to
ā occurred first in West Germanic and spread to North Germanic later since word-final
ē was lowered before it was shortened in West Germanic, but in North Germanic the shortening occurred first, resulting in
e that later merged with
i. However, there are also a number of common archaisms in West Germanic shared by neither Old Norse nor Gothic. Some authors who support the concept of a West Germanic proto-language claim that, not only shared innovations can require the existence of a linguistic
clade, but also that there are archaisms that cannot be explained simply as retentions later lost in the North or East, because this assumption can produce contradictions with attested features of the other branches. Concerning the existence of a Proto–West Germanic clade Ringe has argued that "all the West Germanic languages share several highly unusual innovations that virtually force us to posit a West Germanic clade", although "the internal subgrouping of both North Germanic and West Germanic is very messy, and it seems clear that each of those subfamilies diversified into a network of dialects that remained in contact for a considerable period of time (in some cases right up to the present)".
The reconstruction of Proto–West Germanic Several scholars have published reconstructions of Proto–West Germanic morphological paradigms and many authors have reconstructed individual Proto–West Germanic morphological forms or lexemes. The first comprehensive reconstruction of the Proto–West Germanic language was published in 2013 by
Wolfram Euler, followed in 2014 by the study of
Donald Ringe and Ann Taylor.
Dating Proto–West Germanic If indeed Proto–West Germanic existed, it must have been between the 2nd and 7th centuries. Until the late 2nd century AD, the language of runic inscriptions found in Scandinavia and in Northern Germany were so similar that Proto–North Germanic and the Western dialects in the south were still part of one language ("Proto–Northwest Germanic"). Sometime after that, the split into West and North Germanic occurred. By the 4th and 5th centuries the
great migration set in. By the end of the 6th century, the area in which West Germanic languages were spoken, at least by the upper classes, had tripled compared to the year 400. This caused an increasing disintegration of the West Germanic language and finally the formation of the daughter languages. It has been argued that, judging by their nearly identical syntax, the West Germanic dialects were closely enough related to have been mutually intelligible up to the 7th century. Over the course of this period, the dialects diverged successively. The
High German consonant shift that occurred mostly during the 7th century AD in what is now southern Germany, Austria, and Switzerland can be considered the end of the linguistic unity among the West Germanic dialects, although its effects on their own should not be overestimated. Bordering dialects very probably continued to be mutually intelligible even beyond the boundaries of the consonant shift.
Middle Ages During the
Early Middle Ages, the West Germanic languages were separated by the insular development of
Old and
Middle English on one hand, and by the
High German consonant shift on the continent on the other. The
High German consonant shift distinguished the
High German languages from the other West Germanic languages. By early modern times, the span had extended into considerable differences, ranging from
Highest Alemannic in the South (the
Walliser dialect being the southernmost surviving German dialect) to
Northern Low Saxon in the North. Although both extremes are considered
German, they are not mutually intelligible. The southernmost varieties have completed the second sound shift, whereas the northern dialects remained unaffected by the consonant shift. Of modern German varieties,
Low German is the one that most resembles modern English. The district of
Angeln (or Anglia), from which the name
English derives, is in the extreme northern part of Germany between the Danish border and the Baltic coast. The area of the Saxons (parts of today's
Schleswig-Holstein and
Lower Saxony) lay south of Anglia. The
Angles and
Saxons, two
Germanic tribes, in combination with a number of other peoples from northern
Germany and the
Jutland Peninsula, particularly the
Jutes, settled in Britain following the end of Roman rule in the island. Once in Britain, these Germanic peoples eventually developed a shared cultural and linguistic identity as
Anglo-Saxons; the extent of the linguistic influence of the native
Romano-British population on the incomers is debatable. == Family tree ==