1821 to 1972 Early years The Manchester Guardian was founded in
Manchester in 1821 by cotton merchant
John Edward Taylor with backing from the
Little Circle, a group of
non-conformist businessmen. They launched the paper, on 5 May 1821 (by chance the very day of
Napoleon's death) after the police closure of the more
radical Manchester Observer, a paper that had championed the cause of the
Peterloo massacre protesters. Taylor had been hostile to the radical reformers, writing: "They have appealed not to the reason but the passions and the suffering of their abused and credulous fellow-countrymen, from whose ill-requited industry they extort for themselves the means of a plentiful and comfortable existence. They do not toil, neither do they spin, but they live better than those that do." When the government closed down the
Manchester Observer, the mill-owners' champions had the upper hand. The influential journalist
Jeremiah Garnett joined Taylor during the establishment of the paper, and all of the Little Circle wrote articles for the new paper. The prospectus announcing the new publication proclaimed that it would "zealously enforce the principles of civil and religious Liberty ... warmly advocate the cause of Reform ... endeavour to assist in the diffusion of just principles of Political Economy and ... support, without reference to the party from which they emanate, all serviceable measures". In 1825, the paper merged with the
British Volunteer and was known as
The Manchester Guardian and British Volunteer until 1828. The
working-class Manchester and Salford Advertiser called
The Manchester Guardian "the foul prostitute and dirty
parasite of the worst portion of the mill-owners".
The Manchester Guardian was generally hostile to labour's claims. Of the
1832 Ten Hours Bill, the paper doubted whether in view of the foreign competition "the passing of a law positively enacting a gradual destruction of the cotton manufacture in this kingdom would be a much less rational procedure."
The Manchester Guardian dismissed strikes as the work of outside agitators, stating that "if an accommodation can be effected, the occupation of the agents of the Union is gone. They live on strife ... ." In March 2023, an academic review commissioned by the
Scott Trust determined that John Edward Taylor and nine of his eleven backers had links to the
Atlantic slave trade through their interests in Manchester's textile industry.
Slavery and the American Civil War The newspaper opposed slavery and supported
free trade. An 1823 leading article on the continuing "cruelty and injustice" to slaves in the
West Indies long after the abolition of the slave trade with the
Slave Trade Act 1807 wanted fairness to the interests and claims both of the planters and of their oppressed slaves. It welcomed the
Slavery Abolition Act 1833 and accepted the "increased compensation" to the planters as the "guilt of slavery attaches far more to the nation" rather than individuals. Success of the Act would encourage emancipation in other slave-owning nations to avoid "imminent risk of a violent and bloody termination". However, the newspaper argued against restricting trade with countries that had not yet abolished slavery. Complex tensions developed in the United States. When the abolitionist
George Thompson toured, the newspaper said that "[s]lavery is a monstrous evil, but civil war is not a less one; and we would not seek the abolition even of the former through the imminent hazard of the latter". It suggested that the United States should compensate slave-owners for freeing slaves and called on President
Franklin Pierce to resolve the 1856 "civil war", the
Sacking of Lawrence due to pro-slavery laws imposed by Congress. In 1860,
The Observer quoted a report that the newly elected president
Abraham Lincoln was opposed to abolition of slavery. On 13 May 1861, shortly after the start of the
American Civil War, the
Manchester Guardian portrayed the Northern states as primarily imposing a burdensome trade monopoly on the
Confederate States, arguing that if the South was freed to have direct trade with Europe, "the day would not be distant when slavery itself would cease". Therefore, the newspaper asked "Why should the South be prevented from freeing itself from slavery?" This hopeful view was also held by the
Liberal leader
William Ewart Gladstone. in
Manchester, with extracts from the working men's letter and his reply on its base There was division in Britain over the Civil War, even within political parties. The
Manchester Guardian had also been conflicted. It had supported other
independence movements and felt it should also support the rights of the Confederacy to self-determination. It criticised Lincoln's
Emancipation Proclamation for not freeing all American slaves. By then, the
Union blockade was causing
suffering in British towns. Some including
Liverpool supported the Confederacy as did "current opinion in all classes" in London. On 31 December 1862, cotton workers held a meeting at the
Free Trade Hall in Manchester which resolved "its detestation of negro slavery in America, and of the attempt of the rebellious Southern slave-holders to organise on the great American continent a nation having slavery as its basis". There was a comment that "an effort had been made in a leading article of the
Manchester Guardian to deter the working men from assembling together for such a purpose". The newspaper reported all this and published their letter to President Lincoln while complaining that "the chief occupation, if not the chief object of the meeting, seems to have been to abuse the
Manchester Guardian". but in what from today's perspective looks an ill-judged editorial wrote that "[o]f his rule we can never speak except as a series of acts abhorrent to every true notion of constitutional right and human liberty", adding: "it is doubtless to be regretted that he had not the opportunity of vindicating his good intentions". Scott supported the movement for
women's suffrage, but was critical of any tactics by the
suffragettes that involved
direct action: "The really ludicrous position is that
Mr Lloyd George is fighting to enfranchise seven million women and the militants are smashing unoffending people's windows and breaking up benevolent societies' meetings in a desperate effort to prevent him." Scott thought the Suffragettes' "courage and devotion" was "worthy of a better cause and saner leadership". It has been argued that Scott's criticism reflected a widespread disdain, at the time, for those women who "transgressed the gender expectations of
Edwardian society". Scott's friendship with
Chaim Weizmann played a role in the
Balfour Declaration. In 1948
The Manchester Guardian was a supporter of the new State of Israel. Ownership of the paper passed in June 1936 to the
Scott Trust (named after the last owner,
John Russell Scott, who was the first chairman of the Trust). This move ensured the paper's independence. From 1930 to 1967, a special archival copy of all the daily newspapers was preserved in 700
zinc cases. These were found in 1988 while the newspaper's archives were deposited at the
University of Manchester's
John Rylands University Library, on the Oxford Road campus. The first case was opened and found to contain the newspapers issued in August 1930 in pristine condition. The zinc cases had been made each month by the newspaper's plumber and stored for posterity. The other 699 cases were not opened and were all returned to storage at
The Guardians garage, owing to shortage of space at the library.
Spanish Civil War Traditionally affiliated with the centrist to centre-left
Liberal Party, and with a northern, non-conformist circulation base, the paper earned a national reputation and the respect of the left during the
Spanish Civil War (1936–1939).
George Orwell wrote in
Homage to Catalonia (1938): "Of our larger papers, the
Manchester Guardian is the only one that leaves me with an increased respect for its honesty". With the pro-Liberal
News Chronicle, the
Labour-supporting
Daily Herald, the
Communist Party's
Daily Worker and several Sunday and weekly papers, it supported the Republican government against General
Francisco Franco's insurgent nationalists.
Post-war The paper's then editor,
A. P. Wadsworth, so loathed Labour's left-wing champion
Aneurin Bevan, who had made a reference to getting rid of "Tory Vermin" in a speech "and the hate-gospellers of his entourage" that it encouraged readers to vote Conservative in the
1951 general election and remove
Clement Attlee's post-war Labour government.
The Manchester Guardian strongly opposed military intervention during the 1956
Suez Crisis: "The Anglo-French ultimatum to Egypt is an act of folly, without justification in any terms but brief expediency. It pours petrol on a growing fire. There is no knowing what kind of explosion will follow." On 24 August 1959,
The Manchester Guardian changed its name to
The Guardian. This change reflected the growing prominence of national and international affairs in the newspaper. In September 1961,
The Guardian, which had previously only been published in
Manchester, began to be printed in London.
Nesta Roberts was appointed as the newspaper's first news editor there, becoming the first woman to hold such a position on a British national newspaper.
1972 to 2000 The Troubles During the early period of
the Troubles in
Northern Ireland,
The Guardian supported British state intervention to quell disturbances between
Irish Catholics and
Ulster loyalists. After the 1969
Battle of the Bogside between Catholic residents of
Derry and the
Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC),
The Guardian called for the
British Armed Forces to be deployed to the region, arguing that their deployment would "present a more disinterested face of law and order" than the RUC. The Army was deployed from 1969. On 30 January 1972, troops from the
1st Battalion, Parachute Regiment opened fire on a
Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association march, killing fourteen people in an event that came to be known as
Bloody Sunday. In response to the incident,
The Guardian argued that "Neither side can escape condemnation... The organisers of the demonstration, Miss
Bernadette Devlin among them, deliberately challenged the ban on marches. They knew that stone throwing and sniping could not be prevented, and that the
IRA might
use the crowd as a shield."
The Guardian further stated that "It is certainly true that the army cordons had endured a wanton barrage of stones, steel bars, and other missiles. That still does not justify opening fire so freely."
The Guardian published an article on 20 April 1972 which supported the tribunal and its findings, arguing that "Widgery's report is not one-sided". In response to the introduction of
internment without trial in Northern Ireland,
The Guardian argued that "Internment without trial is hateful, repressive and undemocratic. In the existing Irish situation, most regrettably, it is also inevitable... To remove the ringleaders, in the hope that the atmosphere might calm down, is a step to which there is no obvious alternative."
Sarah Tisdall In 1983, the paper was at the centre of a controversy surrounding documents regarding the stationing of
cruise missiles in Britain that were leaked to
The Guardian by civil servant
Sarah Tisdall. The paper eventually complied with a court order to hand over the documents to the authorities, which led to a six-month prison sentence for Tisdall. "I still blame myself", said
Peter Preston, who was the editor of
The Guardian at the time, but he went on to argue that the paper had no choice because it "believed in the rule of law". In a 2019 article discussing
Julian Assange and the protection of sources by journalists,
John Pilger criticised the editor of
The Guardian for betraying Tisdall by choosing not to go to prison "on a fundamental principle of protecting a source".
The Observer The
Guardian Media Group acquired the
Sunday newspaper The Observer in June 1993, after a rival acquisition bid by
The Independent was rejected. This extended the Guardian's publishing to 7 days a week. While the Observer continued to operate as a separate published newspaper with its own editorial team and journalists, over time its digital content became part of The Guardian's online presence.
The Observer was sold to Tortoise Media, effective from April 2025.
Alleged penetration by Russian intelligence In 1994,
KGB defector
Oleg Gordievsky identified
Guardian literary editor
Richard Gott as "an agent of influence". While Gott denied that he received cash, he admitted he had had lunch at the Soviet Embassy and had taken benefits from the KGB on overseas visits. Gott resigned from his post. Gordievsky commented on the newspaper: "The KGB loved
The Guardian. It was deemed highly susceptible to penetration."
Jonathan Aitken In 1995, both the
Granada Television programme
World in Action and
The Guardian were sued for
libel by the
cabinet minister Jonathan Aitken, for their allegation that
Harrods owner
Mohamed Al Fayed had paid for Aitken and his wife to stay at the
Hôtel Ritz in Paris, essentially a bribe to Aitken. Aitken publicly stated that he would fight with "the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of British fair play". The court case proceeded, and in 1997
The Guardian produced evidence that Aitken's claim of his wife paying for the hotel stay was untrue. In 1999, Aitken was jailed for
perjury and
perverting the course of justice.
Connection In May 1998, a series of
Guardian investigations exposed that a much-garlanded ITV documentary
The Connection produced by Carlton Television
was mostly fabricated. The documentary purported to film an undiscovered route by which heroin was smuggled into the United Kingdom from Colombia. An internal inquiry at Carlton found that
The Guardians allegations were in large part correct, and the regulator
Independent Television Commission (ITC) punished Carlton with a record £2 million fine for multiple breaches of the UK's broadcasting codes. The scandal led to an impassioned debate about the accuracy of documentary production. In June 1998
The Guardian revealed further fabrications in another Carlton documentary by the same director.
Kosovo War The paper supported
NATO's military intervention in the
Kosovo War in 1998–1999.
The Guardian stated that "the only honourable course for Europe and America is to use military force".
Mary Kaldor's piece was headlined "Bombs away! But to save civilians, we must get in some soldiers too."
Since 2000 for an article relating to
Julian Assange in 2014 In the early 2000s,
The Guardian challenged the
Act of Settlement 1701 and the
Treason Felony Act 1848. In October 2004,
The Guardian published a humorous column by
Charlie Brooker in its entertainment guide, the final sentence of which was viewed by some as a call for violence against US President
George W. Bush; after a controversy, Brooker and the paper issued an apology, saying the "closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action". Following the
7 July 2005 London bombings,
The Guardian published an article on its comment pages by
Dilpazier Aslam, a 27-year-old British Muslim and journalism trainee from
Yorkshire. Aslam was a member of
Hizb ut-Tahrir, an
Islamist group, and had published a number of articles on their website. According to the newspaper, it did not know that Aslam was a member of Hizb ut-Tahrir when he applied to become a trainee, though several staff members were informed of this once he started at the paper. The
Home Office said that the group's "ultimate aim is the establishment of an Islamic state (Caliphate), according to Hizb ut-Tahrir via non-violent means".
The Guardian asked Aslam to resign his membership of the group and, when he did not do so, terminated his employment. In early 2009,
The Guardian started a tax investigation into a number of major UK companies, including publishing a database of the tax paid by the
FTSE 100 companies. Internal documents relating to
Barclays Bank's
tax avoidance were removed from
The Guardian website after Barclays obtained a
gagging order. The newspaper played a pivotal role in exposing the depth of the
News of the World phone hacking affair.
The Economist Intelligent Life magazine opined that:
Israeli-Palestinian conflict coverage In recent decades,
The Guardian has been accused of biased
criticism of Israeli government policy and of bias against the Palestinians. In December 2003, columnist
Julie Burchill cited "striking bias against the state of Israel" as one of the reasons she left the paper for
The Times. Responding to these accusations, a
Guardian editorial in 2002 condemned antisemitism and defended the paper's right to criticise the policies and actions of the Israeli government, arguing that those who view such criticism as inherently anti-Jewish are mistaken. Harriet Sherwood, then
The Guardian foreign editor and later its Jerusalem correspondent, has also denied that
The Guardian has an anti-Israel bias, saying that the paper aims to cover all viewpoints in the
Israeli–Palestinian conflict. On 6 November 2011, Chris Elliott,
The Guardians readers' editor, wrote that "
Guardian reporters, writers and editors must be more vigilant about the language they use when writing about Jews or Israel", citing recent cases where
The Guardian received complaints regarding language chosen to describe Jews or Israel. Elliott noted that, over nine months, he upheld complaints regarding language in certain articles that were seen as anti-Semitic, revising the language and footnoting this change.
The Guardians style guide section referred to
Tel Aviv as the capital of Israel in 2012. In 2012, media watchdog
HonestReporting filed a complaint with the
Press Complaints Commission (PCC) after
The Guardian ran a correction apologising for "wrongly" having called Jerusalem as Israel's capital. After an initial ruling supporting
The Guardian, the PCC retracted its original ruling, leading to the newspaper's acknowledgement that it was wrong to call Tel Aviv Israel's capital.
The Guardian later clarified: "In 1980, the Israeli Knesset enacted a law designating the city of Jerusalem, including East Jerusalem, as the country's capital. In response, the UN security council issued resolution 478, censuring the 'change in character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem' and calling on all member states with diplomatic missions in the city to withdraw. The UN has reaffirmed this position on several occasions, and almost every country now has its embassy in Tel Aviv. While it was therefore right to issue a correction to make clear Israel's designation of Jerusalem as its capital is not recognised by the international community, we accept that it is wrong to state that Tel Aviv – the country's financial and diplomatic centre – is the capital. The style guide has been amended accordingly." On 11 August 2014 the print edition of
The Guardian published a pro-Israeli advocacy advert during the
2014 Israel–Gaza conflict featuring
Elie Wiesel, headed by the words "Jews rejected child sacrifice 3,500 years ago. Now it's Hamas' turn."
The Times had decided against running the ad, although it had already appeared in major American newspapers. One week later, Chris Elliott expressed the opinion that the newspaper should have rejected the language used in the advert and should have negotiated with the advertiser on this matter. In October 2023,
The Guardian stated it would not renew the contract of cartoonist
Steve Bell after he submitted a cartoon featuring Netanyahu, with his shirt open, wearing boxing gloves and holding a scalpel over a dotted shape of the
Gaza Strip on his stomach. The caption read: "Residents of Gaza, get out now." Due to what has been seen by some as a reference to Shakespeare's
Shylock's "pound of flesh", it prompted accusations that it was antisemitic. Bell said that he was inspired by the 1960s "Johnson's Scar" cartoon by
David Levine of US president
Lyndon B Johnson within the context of the
Vietnam War.
Clark County In August 2004, for the
US presidential election, the daily
G2 supplement launched an experimental letter-writing campaign in
Clark County, Ohio, an average-sized county in a
swing state. Editor
Ian Katz bought a voter list from the county for $25 and asked readers to write to people listed as undecided in the election, giving them an impression of the international view and the importance of voting against President George W. Bush. Katz admitted later that he did not believe Democrats who warned that the campaign would benefit Bush and not his opponent,
John Kerry. The newspaper scrapped "Operation Clark County" on 21 October 2004 after first publishing a column of responses—nearly all of them outraged—to the campaign under the headline "Dear Limey assholes". Some commentators suggested that the public's dislike of the campaign contributed to Bush's victory in Clark County.
International editions In 2007, the paper launched
Guardian America, an attempt to capitalise on its large online readership in the United States, which at the time stood at more than 5.9 million. The company hired former
American Prospect editor,
New York magazine columnist and
New York Review of Books writer
Michael Tomasky to head the project and hire a staff of American reporters and web editors. The site featured news from
The Guardian that was relevant to an American audience: coverage of US news and the Middle East, for example. Tomasky stepped down from his position as editor of
Guardian America in February 2009, ceding editing and planning duties to other US and London staff. He retained his position as a columnist and blogger, taking the title editor-at-large. In October 2009, the company abandoned the
Guardian America homepage, instead directing users to a US news index page on the main
Guardian website. The following month, the company laid off six American employees, including a reporter, a multimedia producer and four web editors. The move came as
Guardian News and Media opted to reconsider its US strategy amid a huge effort to cut costs across the company. In subsequent years, however,
The Guardian has hired various commentators on US affairs including
Ana Marie Cox,
Michael Wolff,
Naomi Wolf,
Glenn Greenwald and George W. Bush's former speechwriter
Josh Treviño. Treviño's first blog post was an apology for a controversial tweet posted in June 2011 over the second Gaza flotilla, the controversy which had been revived by the appointment.
Guardian US launched in September 2011, led by editor-in-chief
Janine Gibson, which replaced the previous
Guardian America service. After a period during which
Katharine Viner served as the US editor-in-chief before taking charge of
Guardian News and Media as a whole, Viner's former deputy, Lee Glendinning, was appointed to succeed her as head of the American operation at the beginning of June 2015.
The Guardian later launched Australian and "International" digital editions in 2013 and 2015 respectively. In September 2023, a European digital edition was launched, part of the newspaper's efforts to be "even more European in its perspective, not less" after
Brexit. Ten journalists and four columnists were initially hired for the edition. After a year, European readership increased 15%, with Ireland, Germany, France, Spain, and the Netherlands providing the editions biggest audiences.
Gagged from reporting Parliament In October 2009,
The Guardian reported that it was forbidden to report on a parliamentary matter, a question recorded in a Commons order paper, to be answered by a minister later that week. The newspaper noted that it was being "forbidden from telling its readers why the paper is prevented—for the first time in memory—from reporting parliament. Legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret. The only fact
The Guardian can report is that the case involves the London solicitors
Carter-Ruck." The paper further stated that this case appeared "to call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the
1689 Bill of Rights". The only parliamentary question mentioning Carter-Ruck in the relevant period was by
Paul Farrelly MP, in reference to legal action by
Barclays and
Trafigura. The part of the question referencing Carter-Ruck relates to the latter company's September 2009 gagging order on the publication of a 2006 internal report into the
2006 Côte d'Ivoire toxic waste dump scandal, which involved a
class action case that the company only settled in September 2009 after
The Guardian published some of the commodity trader's internal emails. The reporting injunction was lifted the next day, as Carter-Ruck withdrew it before
The Guardian could challenge it in the High Court.
Alan Rusbridger attributed the rapid back-down by Carter-Ruck to postings on
Twitter, as did a
BBC News Online article.
Edward Snowden leaks and intervention by the UK government In June 2013, the newspaper broke news of the secret collection of
Verizon telephone records held by
Barack Obama's administration and subsequently revealed the existence of the
PRISM surveillance program after it was leaked to the paper by former
NSA contractor
Edward Snowden. The newspaper was subsequently contacted by the British government's Cabinet Secretary, Sir
Jeremy Heywood, under instruction from Prime Minister David Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister
Nick Clegg, who ordered that the hard drives containing the information be destroyed.
The Guardian offices were then visited in July 2013 by agents from the UK's
GCHQ, who supervised the destruction of the hard drives containing information acquired from Snowden.
The Guardian said it had destroyed the hard drives to avoid threatened legal action by the UK government that could have stopped it from reporting on US and British government surveillance contained in the documents. In June 2014,
The Register reported that the information the government sought to suppress by destroying the hard drives related to the location of a "beyond top secret" internet monitoring base in
Seeb, Oman, and the close involvement of
BT and
Cable & Wireless in intercepting internet communications.
Julian Assange criticised the newspaper for not publishing the entirety of the content when it had the chance. Rusbridger had initially covered the Snowden documents without the government's supervision, but subsequently sought it, and established an ongoing relationship with the
Defence Ministry.
The Guardian coverage of Snowden later continued because the information had already been copied outside the United Kingdom, earning the company's US website,
The Guardian US, an
American Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 2014. Rusbridger and subsequent chief editors would sit on the government's DSMA-Notice board.
Treatment of Julian Assange The Guardian published the
US diplomatic cables files and the
Guantanamo Bay files in collaboration with
Julian Assange and
WikiLeaks. When some of the diplomatic cables were made available online in unredacted form, WikiLeaks blamed
Guardian journalists
David Leigh and
Luke Harding for publishing the encryption key to the files in their book ''
WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy. The Guardian'' blamed Assange for the release of the unredacted cables. Journalist
Glenn Greenwald, a former contributor to
The Guardian, accused
The Guardian of publishing false claims about Assange in a report about an interview Assange gave to Italian newspaper
La Repubblica.
The Guardian article had claimed that Assange had praised
Donald Trump and criticised
Hillary Clinton and also alleged that Assange had "long had a close relationship with the Putin regime". Greenwald wrote: "This article is about how those [
Guardian] false claims—fabrications, really—were spread all over the internet by journalists, causing hundreds of thousands of people (if not millions) to consume false news".
The Guardian later amended its article about Assange to remove the claim about his connection to the Russian government. While Assange was in the Ecuadorian embassy,
The Guardian published a number of articles pushing the narrative that there was a link between Assange and the Russian government. The name of a third author,
Fernando Villavicencio, was removed from the online version of the story soon after publication. The title of the story was originally "Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy". A few hours after publication, "sources say" was added to the title, and the meeting became an "apparent meeting". One reporter characterised the story, "If it's right, it might be the biggest get this year. If it's wrong, it might be the biggest gaffe." Manafort and Assange both said they had never met, with the latter threatening legal action against
The Guardian. Ecuador's London consul Fidel Narváez, who had worked at
Ecuador's embassy in London from 2010 to July 2018, said that Manafort had not visited Assange.
Priti Patel cartoon In 2020
The Guardian was accused of being "racist and misogynistic" after it published a cartoon depicting
Home Secretary,
Priti Patel as a cow with a ring in its nose in an alleged reference to her
Hindu faith, since cows are considered sacred in
Hinduism.
Alleged WhatsApp backdoor After publishing a story on 13 January 2017 claiming that
WhatsApp had a "backdoor [that] allows snooping on messages", more than 70 professional cryptographers signed on to an open letter calling for
The Guardian to retract the article. On 13 June 2017, readers' editor Paul Chadwick released an article detailing the flawed reporting in the original January article, which was amended to remove references to a backdoor.
Spanish-language edition In January 2021 the Mexican
La Lista Web portal started publishing content from
The Guardian, translated into Spanish, on a three-year licence. The press release announcing this pointed out that
The Guardian often criticised Mexican president
Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
2022 cyber-attack In December 2022 it was reported that
The Guardian had suffered a significant cyber-attack on its office systems, thought to be ransomware. Staff were directed to work from home and were able to continue publishing to the website despite the loss of some internal systems. The print edition also continued to be produced. On 4 January 2023, UK staff were informed of a security breach and that the
Information Commissioner's Office had been notified, as required by GDPR. It was indicated that staff would continue working from home until at least 23 January. The newspaper confirmed on 11 January that personal details of all UK staff had been accessed by criminals.
Cyprus Confidential In November 2023, the
Guardian joined with the
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, and 69 media partners including
Distributed Denial of Secrets and the
Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and more than 270 journalists in 55 countries and territories to produce the '
Cyprus Confidential' report on the financial network which supports the regime of
Vladimir Putin, mostly with connections to Cyprus, and showed Cyprus to have strong links with high-up figures in the Kremlin, some of whom have been sanctioned. Government officials including Cyprus president
Nikos Christodoulides and European lawmakers began responding to the investigation's findings in less than 24 hours,
Quitting X (Twitter) On 13 November 2024, a week after
Donald Trump was elected as US president for the second time,
The Guardian announced that it would no longer post content on
X, due what it perceived as the overwhelming amount of misinformation, far-right conspiracy theories and racism on the social media platform, especially during the latest election.
The Guardian said that readers would still be able to share articles on the platform and reporters would be able to continue using it for 'news-gathering purposes'.
Sale of the Observer In September 2024,
The Guardian revealed it was in talks to sell
The Observer to news website
Tortoise Media. Journalists at
Guardian Media Group passed a vote to condemn the sale and passed a vote of no confidence in the newspaper's owners, accusing it of betrayal amid concerns that the sale of the paper could harm the financial security of staff members. On 6 December 2024, it was announced that, despite 48 hours of strikes by journalists, the
Observer deal with Tortoise was agreed in principle and would go ahead. The agreement included the Trust taking a significant stock position in the purchaser. The final sale price has not been disclosed. On 18 December 2024, Guardian Media and Tortoise Media closed the sale. A new
Observer website was launched on 25 April 2025, and the first print edition under Tortoise appeared on 27 April 2025. ==Ownership and finances==