"Book of the Miracles of Creation" (reportedly destroyed by Saint Brendan) According to the Dutch
De Reis van Sinte Brandaen (Mediaeval Dutch for
The Voyage of Saint Brendan), one of the earliest accounts of the life of
Saint Brendan, the Saint got possession of a
"Book of the Miracles of Creation", but disbelieved in its veracity and threw it into a fire. An angel was angry with Brendan for this act, told him that truth has been destroyed, and charged him with traveling for nine years overseas as a penance for his sin. All accounts of Brendan's life were written down hundreds of years after his time, and it is difficult to distinguish fact from legend – including this account of his burning a book. However, since Brendan was a major, highly venerated Irish saint, there was no obvious reason for posterity to attribute to him a sinful act without any factual basis.
Patriarch Eutychius' book (by Emperor Tiberius II Constantine) Patriarch Eutychius of Constantinople published a treatise, on the
General Resurrection, maintaining that the resurrected body "will be more subtle than air, and no longer palpable". Pope
Gregory the Great opposed, citing the palpability of the risen Christ. As the dispute could not be settled, the
Byzantine emperor,
Tiberius II Constantine, undertook to arbitrate. He decided in favor of palpability and ordered Eutychius' book to be burned.
Repeated destruction of Alexandria libraries (multiple people) The so-called "Daughter Library" of the
Serapeum of Alexandria was reportedly looted and burned (along with the rest of the Serapeum) in 391/392 AD by the decree of
Theophilus of Alexandria, who was ordered to do so by
Theodosius I. However, contemporary accounts do not mention the destruction of a library, or speak of its collection of books in the past tense, indicating that by the time of its destruction the Serapeum may have been relegated mostly to a
pagan place of worship. One of the largest destructions of books occurred at the
Library of Alexandria, traditionally held to be in 640; however, the precise years are unknown, as is whether the fires were intentional or accidental.
Qur'anic texts with varying wording (ordered by the 3rd Caliph, Uthman) Uthman ibn 'Affan, the third
Caliph of Islam after
Muhammad, who is credited with overseeing the collection of the verses of the
Qur'an, ordered the destruction of any other remaining text containing verses of the Quran after the Quran has been fully collected, . This was done to ensure that the collected and authenticated Quranic copy that Uthman collected became the primary source for others to follow, thereby ensuring that Uthman's version of the Quran remained authentic. Although the Qur'an had mainly been propagated through oral transmission, it also had already been recorded in at least three
codices, most importantly the codex of Abdullah ibn Mas'ud in
Kufa, and the codex of Ubayy ibn Ka'b in
Syria. Sometime between 650 and 656, a committee appointed by Uthman is believed to have produced a singular version in seven copies, and Uthman is said to have "sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered any other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt."
Iconoclast writings (by Byzantine authorities) Following the "
Triumph of Orthodoxy" in 843, when the
Byzantine Iconoclasts were decisively defeated and the worship of Icons formally restored, the Byzantine secular and religious authorities destroyed almost all Iconoclast writings, making it difficult for modern researchers to determine what exactly were the Iconoclasts' reasons to oppose the use of icons in Christian worship.
Book Burnings in Ummayad Al-Andalus The Ummayad Caliph,
Abd al-Rahman III, condemned the works of
Muhammad ibn Masarra (died 931), a local scholar interested in
kalam and
sufism, in a series of decrees as heretical; causing ibn Massara's books to be burnt in the courtyard of the
Great Mosque of Cordoba in 961. This event sets a precedent for later Muslim book burnings for jurists and rulers in Spain and the
Maghreb. As such,
al-Manṣūr replicated this act by burning books from the library of the caliph
al-Hakam II in order to demonstrate his commitment to Islam, gain popular favor and cement his own rule.
Library of Ray (by Ghaznavids) In 1029, the Sunni
Ghaznavid ruler
Mahmud, during the sack of
Ray, destroyed a large part of the collection of its
Buyyid owners as he considered the books, many of them Shiite, heretical. The surviving books were then taken to Mahmud's capital of
Ghazni.
Competing prayer books (at Toledo) After the conquest of
Toledo, Spain (1085) by the king of Castile, whether
Iberian Christians should follow the foreign
Roman rite or the traditional
Mozarabic rite became a subject of dispute. After other
ordeals, the dispute was submitted to the
trial by fire: One book for each rite was thrown into a fire. The Toledan book was little damaged after the Roman one was consumed.
Henry Jenner comments in the
Catholic Encyclopedia: "No one who has seen a
Mozarabic manuscript with its extraordinarily solid
vellum, will adopt any hypothesis of Divine Interposition here."
Almohad and Almoravid Al-Andalus In 1109, the masterwork of al-Ghazālī,
Iḥ yā’ `Ulūm al-Dīn (
The Revival of the Religious Sciences), was burned on command of the Almoravid amir
Ali ibn Yusuf in the courtyard of the Great Mosque of Cordoba in front of the assembled notables.
Writings of Arnold of Brescia (in France and Rome) Arnold of Brescia spoke out against several of the actions taken by the Church of Rome, specifically related to the Church's wealth. He was condemned at the
Synod of Sens in 1141, and went on to lead the
Commune of Rome in direct opposition to the Pope. The Church ordered all of his writings to be burned, which was done in such a through manner that the only evidence showing he wrote anything is the order for its destruction. Arnold was eventually arrested and hung in 1155, his body was then burned. Nevertheless, Arnold's teachings and beliefs on
apostolic poverty retained their influence after his death among "Arnoldists" and more widely among
Waldensians and the
Spiritual Franciscans.
Nalanda University (by Bakhtiyar Khilji) The library of
Nalanda, known as Dharma Gunj (Mountain of Truth) or Dharmagañja (Treasury of Truth), was the most renowned repository of Hindu and Buddhist knowledge in the world at the time. Its collection was said to comprise hundreds of thousands of volumes, so extensive that it burned for months when set aflame by
Muslim invaders in 1193.
Buddhist writings in the Maldives (by royal dynasty converted to Islam) Following the conversion of the
Maldives to Islam in 1153 (or by some accounts in 1193), the
Buddhist religion – hitherto state religion for more than a thousand years – was suppressed. The Dhanbidhū
Lōmāfānu gives information about events in the southern
Haddhunmathi Atoll, which had been a major center of Buddhism – where monks were beheaded, and where the statues of
Vairocana and the transcendent
Buddha were destroyed. At that time, the wealth of Buddhist manuscripts written on
screwpine leaves by Maldivian monks in their Buddhist monasteries were either burnt or otherwise so thoroughly eliminated that they disappeared without leaving any trace.
Buddhist writings in the Gangetic plains region of India (by Turk-Mongol raiders) According to William Johnston, as part of the
Muslim conquest of the Indian subcontinent, there was a persecution of the Buddhist religion, considered idolatrous from the Muslim point of view. During the 12th and 13th centuries, Buddhist texts were burnt by the Muslim armies in the Gangetic plains region, which also destroyed hundreds of Buddhist monasteries and shrines and killed monks and nuns.
Ismaili Shite writings at Al-Azhar (by Saladin) Between 120,000 and 2,000,000 works were destroyed under
Saladin when he converted the Al-Azhar madrassah from
Ismaili Shiism to
Sunni Islam.
Alamut Castle (by Mongols) The library of the
Alamut Castle, the main stronghold of the order of the
Nizari Ismailis, was burned after the invading Mongols captured it. It is widely accepted that the Mongols burned Alamut for religious reasons, as the library contained many materials the Mongols believed to be heretical, but it is also noted that the capture of Alamut gave the Mongols a significant military advantage. Due to the destruction, there are very few primary sources from the Ismailis remaining today.
Destruction of Cathar texts (Languedoc region of France, by the Catholic Church) painting of a disputation between
Saint Dominic of Guzman and the
Albigensians (
Cathars) in which the books of both were thrown on a fire, with St. Dominic's books miraculously preserved from the flames.
See the whole picture. During the 13th century, the Catholic Church waged a brutal campaign against the
Cathars of
Languedoc, culminating in the
Albigensian Crusade. Nearly every
Cathar text that could be found was destroyed, in an effort to completely extirpate their heretical beliefs; only a few are known to have survived. Historians researching the Cathar religious principles are forced to largely rely on information written by their opponents.
Maimonides' philosophy (at Montpellier) Maimonides' major philosophical and theological work, "
Guide for the Perplexed", got highly mixed reactions from fellow-Jews of his and later times – some revering it and viewing it as a triumph, while others deemed many of its ideas
heretical, banning it and on some occasions burning copies of it. One such burning took place at
Montpellier, Southern France, in 1233.
The Talmud (at Paris), first of many such burnings over the next centuries (by Royal and Church authorities) In 1242, The French crown burned all copies of the
Talmud in Paris, about 12,000, after the book was "charged" and "found guilty" in the
Disputation of Paris, sometimes called "the Paris debate" or the "Trial of the Talmud." These burnings of Jewish books were initiated by
Pope Gregory IX, who persuaded
Louis IX of France to undertake it. This particular book burning was commemorated by the German Rabbi and poet
Meir of Rothenburg in the
elegy (kinna) called, ''Sha'ali Serufa Ba'eish, or'' "Ask, O you who are burned in fire" (שאלי שרופה באש), which is recited to this day by
Ashkenazi Jews on the fast of
Tisha B'av. The Church's original stance alleged that the Talmud contained blasphemous writings towards Jesus Christ and his mother Mary, attacks against the Church and other offensive pronouncements against non-Jews, which led subsequent popes to organize public burnings of Jewish books. The best known of these were
Innocent IV (1243–1254),
Clement IV (1256–1268),
John XXII (1316–1334),
Paul IV (1555–1559), and
Pius V (1566–1572). Once the printing press was invented, the Church found it impossible to destroy entire printed editions of the Talmud and other sacred books.
Johann Gutenberg, the German who invented the printing press around 1450, certainly helped stamp out the effectiveness of further book burnings. The tolerant (for its time) policies of Venice made it a center for the printing of Jewish books (and of books in general), yet the Talmud was publicly burned in 1553 and there was a lesser-known burning of Jewish books in 1568.
House of Wisdom library (By Mongols) The
House of Wisdom was destroyed during the
Mongol invasion of Baghdad in 1258, along with all other libraries in
Baghdad. It was said that the waters of the
Tigris ran black for six months with ink from the enormous quantities of books flung into the river. Some modern historians have begun to doubt the actual extent of these damages.
Rabbi Nachmanides' account of the Disputation of Barcelona (by Dominicans) In 1263 the
Disputation of Barcelona was held before King
James I of Aragon between the
monk Pablo Christiani (a convert from Judaism) and
Rabbi Moses ben Nachman (also known as
Nachmanides). At the end of disputation, king awarded Nachmanides a monetary prize and declared that never before had he heard "an unjust cause so nobly defended." Since the Dominicans nevertheless claimed the victory, Nahmanides felt compelled to publish the controversy. The Dominicans asserted that this account was blasphemous against Christianity. Nahmanides admitted that he had stated many things against Christianity, but he had written nothing which he had not used in his disputation in the presence of the King, who had granted him freedom of speech. The justice of his defense was recognized by the King and the commission, but, to satisfy the Dominicans, Nahmanides was exiled and his pamphlet was condemned to be burned.
Lollard books and writings (by English law) The
De heretico comburendo ("On the Burning of Heretics"), a law passed by the English Parliament under King
Henry IV of England in 1401, was intended to stamp out "
heresy" and in particular the
Lollard movement, followers of
John Wycliffe. The law stated that "divers false and perverse people of a certain new sect ...make and write books, [and] do wickedly instruct and inform people". The law's purpose was to "utterly destroy" all "preachings, doctrines, and opinions of this wicked sect". Therefore, all persons in possession of "such books or writings of such wicked doctrine and opinions" were ordered to deliver all such books and writings to the diocesan authorities, within forty days of the law being enacted, so as to let them be burned and destroyed. Those failing to give up their heretical books would face the prospect of being arrested and having their bodies as well as their books burned.
Wycliffe's books (at Prague) On December 20, 1409, Pope
Alexander V (later declared an
anti-Pope) issued a
papal bull that empowered the illiterate
Prague Archbishop
Zbyněk Zajíc z Házmburka to proceed against
Wycliffism in Prague. All copies of Wycliffe's writings were to be surrendered and his doctrines repudiated, and free preaching discontinued. After the publication of the bull in 1410, the Czech Wycliffite leader
Jan Hus appealed to Alexander V, but in vain. The Wycliffe books and valuable manuscripts were burned in the court of the Archbishop's palace in the
Lesser Town of Prague, and Hus and his adherents were
excommunicated by Alexander V. Archbishop Zajíc died in 1411, and with his death there was an upsurge of the
Bohemian Reformation. Some of Hus' followers, led by Vok Voksa z Valdštejna, burnt the Papal bulls. Hus, they said, should be obeyed rather than the Church, which they considered a fraudulent mob of adulterers and
simonists. In January 1413, a general council in Rome condemned the writings of Wycliffe and ordered them to be burned. Hus – tricked into arriving at the
Council of Constance by a false safe conduct – was seized and burned at the stake. Over forty years after Hus's death, the Council reiterated the order for Wycliffe's books to be burned, and since Wycliffe himself was already dead, it ordered that his body be exhumed and burned – which was duly done.
Villena's books (in Castile) Henry of Villena, a scion of
Aragon's
old dynasty, was a scholar, surgeon, and translator who was persecuted by the kings of
Castile and
Aragon as a
sorcerer and
necromancer. Upon his death in prison, of
Castile ordered his confessor
Bishop Barrientos to burn Villena's library The poet
Juan de Mena skewered the bishop for this destruction in his
Labyrinth of Fortune and others accused him of plundering it for the purpose of later plagiarizing the works himself, but Barrientos portrayed himself as bound by his king's orders and as having done what he could to preserve the library's most important works:
Codices of the peoples conquered by the Aztecs (by Itzcoatl) According to the
Madrid Codex, the fourth
tlatoani Itzcoatl (ruling from 1427 (or 1428) to 1440) ordered the burning of all historical
codices because it was "not wise that all the people should know the paintings". Among other purposes, this allowed the Aztec state to develop a state-sanctioned history and mythos that venerated the Aztec god
Huitzilopochtli.
Gemistus Plethon's Nómoi (by Patriarch Gennadius II) After the death of the prominent late Byzantine scholar
Gemistus Plethon, there was discovered among his papers a major work called
Nómōn syngrafí (Νόμων συγγραφή; book of laws) or
Nómoi (Νόμοι; laws). He had been compiling it throughout most of his adult life, but never published it. It contained his most esoteric beliefs, including an objection to some of the basic tenets of Christianity and an explicit advocacy of a restoration (in modified form) of the worship of gods of the Classical
Greek mythology – obviously
heretical as the Orthodox Church understood the term. The manuscript came into the possession of Princess Theodora, wife of
Demetrios,
despot of Morea. Theodora sent the manuscript to
Gennadius II, Patriarch of Constantinople, asking for his advice on what to do with it; he returned it, advising her to destroy it. Morea was under invasion from Sultan
Mehmet II, and Theodora escaped with Demetrios to Constantinople where she gave the manuscript back to Gennadius, reluctant to herself destroy the only copy of such a distinguished scholar's work. Gennadius finally burnt it in 1460. However, in a letter to the Exarch Joseph (which still survives) Gennadius details the book, providing chapter headings and brief summaries of the contents. Plethon's own summary of the
Nómoi, titled
Summary of the Doctrines of Zoroaster and Plato, also survived among manuscripts held by his former student Bessarion – though the full detailed text was lost with Gennadius' burning. ==Early Modern Period (from 1492 to 1650)==